Epstein Secrets

size of his genitalia; (4) In Jane Doe 2, Edwards represented in pleading to the federal Magistrate that records of communications by and between the United States Government and Epstein's criminal defense lawyers in the plea negotiations of the criminal matters were likely to lead to relevant information in the Jane Doe

community control. 21. An assistant U.S. Attorney handling the hearing in federal court relating to the NPA, represented that it was not intent of the United States Government nor was the NPA designed to "hand them [the alleged Epstein victims] a jack pot or a key to the bank." 22. Notwithstanding the agreement reached b

ein Actions. Those investigators included, but were not limited to Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and Ken Jenne, ("Jenne"), employees of RRA. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards and to whom they reported to conduct their investigations of Epstein. 15. In October 2009, on o

gain prior to the - let me start again. EXHIBIT "A" 2 EFTA00606648 Prior to the filing of the lawsuit against Jane Doc 1 and Jane Doe 2 against the United States Government, did you learn from any source, maybe a document, maybe a telephone call or a conversation that you had with a third party separate from your clien

ion on the Epstein files? A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. 201/3-6 201/19-24 201/25 202/4-11 Q. Did you ever authorize or direct Mr. Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Q. If you're unaware of the existence of the entity

ilege. Id. at page 98; line 24-25. Q: All right. At the time you began representing E.W. or at any time prior to the filing of the lawsuit against the United States Government in July of '08, did you learn whether she was listed as a, or deemed to be a victim by the United States Attorney's Office? Transcript of Depositio

e 14-16; and Same objection as well as attorney-client privilege and instruct you not to answer. 198/21-23] Q: Did you ever authorize or direct Mr. Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? Id. at page 201; line 4-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 201; line

EBRUARY 2, 2007 PAGE 3 District of Florida. T state that there have been no additional promises or representations ' made to me by any official of the United States Government or by my attorney in connection with this matter. Dated: Witnessed by: James L. Eisenberg, Esquire EFTA00185233 U.S. Department of Justice Au

mendment right against compelled self-incrimination in connection with civil litigation, a court can stay discovery or the entire civil case. Diaz'. Jenne, 2007 WL 624286 al (S.D. Fl. Feb. 23, 2007) (Cooke, J.). "However, 'the Constitution does not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outco

ilege. Id. at page 98; line 24-25. Q: All right. At the time you began representing E.W. or at any time prior to the filing of the lawsuit against the United States Government in July of '08, did you learn whether she was listed as a, or deemed to be a victim by the United States Attorney's Office? Transcript of Depositio

e 14-16; and Same objection as well as attorney-client privilege and instruct you not to answer. 198/21-23] Q: Did you ever authorize or direct Mr. Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? Id. at page 201; line 4-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 201; line