Epstein Secrets

Cassell told us they wanted the Non-Prosecution Agreement to be set aside. I told him that was not likely to happen. Cassell then suggested that the United States Government should step aside and allow them to "go after" Epstein to get the agreement set aside. I asked him how he expected that would be done, since the o

fter 5:00 Florida time, if you would like further discussions. Sincerely, Paul Cassell, co-counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Voice: Fax: Email: http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles

us they wanted the Non-Prosecution Agreement to be set aside. I told him that was not likely to EFTA00206325 happen. Cassell then suggested that the United States Government should step aside and allow them to "go after" Epstein to get the agreement set aside. I asked him how he expected that would be done, since the o

ur "summary judgment" motion and statement of facts. Hoping that we can begin narrowing down any differences on this as well. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Voice: Fax: EFTA00206326 Email: http://www.law.ut

n against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to [18 . § 2255] and the [Non- Prosecution] agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government"); Compl. ¶1119-20, L.M. U Epstein, Case No. 09- 81092-CIV-Cohn (asserting that plaintiff was "covered by" provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreem

r help on these questions and Brad and I have. EFTA00206130 Sincerely, Paul Cassell Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 8411