Epstein Secrets

n FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 2 of 8 Epstein's entry of guilty pleas to various state charges and an 18-month jail sentence, in exchange for which the U.S. Government apparently agreed to defer all federal prosecution — including any federal prosecution for the federal crimes committed against the victims. At a h

of the protective order barring them front publicly disclosing or discussing the terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffrey Epstein has made no response to this motion. The Government, however, contends that the victims' motion should be denied because the victim

tion was made, and provided such person no longer meets the criteria for registration as a sexual. offender under the laws of this state. (12) The Legislature finds that sexual offenders, especially those who haw committed offenses against minors, often pose a high risk of engaging in sexual offenses even

result in revocation of this permit. (n) Other Approval, If the development covered under this permit requires separate and distinct approval from the United States Government or any agency, department, commission or bureau thereof, then no development or occupancy is allowed under this permit until such permits or approv

Virgin Islands, and upon ratification by the Legislature of the Virgin Islands or by the Committee on Planning and Environmental Protection if the Legislature is not in session. As used herein, the "Effective Date" or the "date hereof' means the date of such ratification. This permit is for a definite ter

sealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to seal the Co

ation was made, and provided such person no longer meets the criteria for registration as a sexual offender under the laws of this state. (12) The Legislature finds chat sexual offenders, especially those who have committed o against minors, often pose a high risk of engaging in sexual offenses even after

will result in revocation of this permit. Other Approval If the development covered under this permit requires separate and distinct approval from the United States Government or the Government of the Virgin Islands, or any agency, department, commission or bureau thereof, then no development or occupancy is allowed under

ble John P. de Jongh, Jr. Date Governor of the Virgin Islands APPROVED Legislature of the Virgin Islands Ronald E. Russell Date President 291° Legislature 6 EFTA00310789 Major Cad Pennit Na CZT-5-99019 modified LS-1, tw I, Maria Tankenson Hodge, Attorney-in-fact for LSJ, LLC, do hereby certify tha

C Ltd 81:60 00/90:Tt EFTA00787911 (o) Other Approval. If the development covered under this permit requires separate and distinct approval from the United States Government or any agency, department, commission or bureau thereof, then no development or occupancy is allowed wader this permit until such permits or approv

r of the Virgin Islands, and ratified by the Legislature of the Virgin Islands or by the Committee on Planning and Environmental Protection, if the Legislature is not in session. As used belch the "Effective Date" or "the date hereof' means the date of such ratification. This permit will expire ten (I0) yea

ealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to seal the Co

thority.-A guard- ian ad litem when appointed shall act as a repres- entative of the child and shall act in the child's best interest. In 1994, the Legislature amended both statutes. Section 61.401 was amended to read: Appointment of guardian ad litem.-In an action for dissolution of marriage, modificatio

sealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to_seal the

thority.-A guard- ian ad litem when appointed shall act as a repres- entative of the child and shall act In the child's best interest. In 1994, the Legislature amended both statutes. Section 61.401 was amended to read: Appointment of guardian ad litem.-In an action for dissolution of marriage, modificatio

of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discussing the terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffrey Epstein has made no response to this motion. The Government, however, contends that the victims' motion should be denied because the victim

ation was made, and provided such person no longer meets the criteria for registration as a sexual offender under the laws of this state. (12) The Legislature finds that sexual offenders, especially those who haw committed offenses against minors, often pose a high risk of engaging in sexual offenses even

ealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions taseal thet

thority.-A guard- ian ad litem when appointed shall act as a repres- entative of the child and shall act in the child's best interest. In 1994, the Legislature amended both statutes. Section 61.401 was amended to read: Appointment of guardian ad litem.-In an action for dissolution of marriage, modificatio

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) 9 It is important to note that the Stat

nation was made, and provided such ponon no longer meets the criteria for registration as a sexual offender under the laws of this state. (12) The Legislature finds that 733143I offenders, especially these who have committee offenses against minors, of ton pace a high risk of engaging In sexual offenses ov