Epstein Secrets

ne Facsimile Florida Bar No.: E-mail: and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City. UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 9 EFTA00208347 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 51 Entered

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

s Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 E-mail: and Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City. UT 84112 E-Mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 9 EFTA00212446 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 03)21.201

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Epstein's MPO, Objections and Integrated Memo of Law et al. Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac flee 33 2 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax Casselto(a)law.utakedu Co-Counselfor Plaintiff Respectfidly submitted, /s/ Joseph L Ackerman. Jr. Jose

tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of

: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah6 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 6 This respons

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

0893-MARRA/JOHNSON Epstein's MPO, Objections and Integrated Memo of Law et al. Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice • 33 2 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Respectfully submitted, /s/ Joseph L Ackerman. Jr. Joseph L Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Lilly Ann Sanc

tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of

42075 E-mail: [email protected] and Li Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe ill and Jane Doe #2 9 L, EFTA00

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 E-mail: bradarloathtoiustice.com Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 841 12 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: cassetp(4law.utah.edu Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 54 08-80736-CV-MARRA

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p