Epstein Secrets

24-2822 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Tara A. Finnigan, Esq.

ntial information without conducting an in camera review to determine whether the assertion of privilege is valid. See Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). 8. If disclosure is made, this court should then determine what portions of the "book" or "journal" shoul

om Cmailto: [email protected] for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 560 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2010 Page 11 of 11 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300

ntial information without conducting an in camera review to determine whether the assertion of privilege is valid. See Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). 7. Moreover, the right to privacy encompasses at least two different kinds of interests, the individual

ach, Florida 33409; [email protected] to: Joni J. Jones, Esq., Assistant Utah Attorney General, Counsel for Plaintiff Cassell, 160 East 300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114; [email protected] to: Bradley J. Edwards, Esq, Farmer, Jaffe et al, 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301;

tirety because on its face it seeks solely privileged and confidential information relating to her retention of BSF.* See Westco Inc. v. Scott Lewis’ Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4™ DCA 2010) (court explaining that “[w]hen confidential information is sought from a non-party, the trial court must deter