Epstein Secrets

nt to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), undersigned counsel contacted counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose th

icense, product approval application, enforcement action, administrative adjudication, or court case. Example 1 to paragraph (h)(I): An employee of the Department of Housing and Urban Development approved a specific city's application for Federal assistance for a renewal project. After leaving Government service, she may not represent the cit

. 12. I never learned any confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter. 13. In late December 2007, I had an "exit meeting" with Dexter Lee, the Office's ethics officer. As part of that meeting, Mr. Lee reviewed with me the Department of Justice's post-employment restrictions. Based on

, license, product approval application, enforcement action, administrative adjudication, Or COUR Case Example I to paragraph (hX1): An employee of the Department of Housing and Urban Development approved a specific citys application for Federal assistance for a renewal project. After leaving Government service, she may not represent the city

r. 12. I never teamed any confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter. 13. In late December 2007, I had an "exit meeting" with Dexter Lee, the Office's ethics officer. As part of that meeting, Mr. Lee reviewed with me the Department of Justice's post-employment restrictions. Based on

, license, product approval application, enforcement action, administrative adjudication, Or COUR Case Example I to paragraph (hX1): An employee of the Department of Housing and Urban Development approved a specific citys application for Federal assistance for a renewal project. After leaving Government service, she may not represent the city