Epstein Secrets

Marra on 7/7/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/09/2008 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dcxtcr Lee on behalf of United States of America (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 07/09/2008) EFTA00177337 Case 9:08-cv-8( giao8-aaestowseit 1AQof: Clintift200t611LS0DPaildirEttf07 ,37.)8 Page 2 of 2 07/09/2008 6

e not been violated. Therefore, her emergency petition should be denied. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney Fla. Bar No. 0936693 99 N.E. 4' Street Miami, Florida 33132 (305) 961-9320 Fax: (305) 530-7139 E-mail: clexter.lee@usd

in which the crime occurred," the CVRA clearly provid for "rights ... that apply before any prosecution is underway." (United States . BP Products North America, Inc., Criminal No. 11-07-434, 2008 WL 501321 at *11 (S.D.Tex. Feb.21, 2008) (emphasis in original), mandamus denied in part, In re Dean, No. 08-20

nt to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), undersigned counsel contacted counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose th

y on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 377I(dX3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant i

nt to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), undersigned counsel contacted counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose th

ely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States" BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(dX3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant i