Epstein Secrets

eys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS, LEHRMAN, P.L. Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.

jury, statements to a jury, that they are going to be then arguing are credible, and so we have this joinder motion, drafted by Mr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell, that they would like to introduce into evidence, whole cloth into evidence, that contains the legal arguments and the statements of lawyers, thes

their response said they want to keep it out. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00592445 H3ulgiva It also was a part of her story in those Sharon 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Churcher articles, your Honor now has in a book in front of you,

this is a voice message that SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA_R1_00024127 EFTA01737531 21 G6ndgium Ms. Churcher left for Paul Cassell, who is a lawyer in this case who entered an appearance in this case, in February of 2015. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1

been provided, and it's germane to the issues before the Court. But what it reveals is that this is not Ms. Churcher's first interaction with Mr. Cassell, lawyer for the plaintiff. They are on a first-name basis. She is feeling free to call him and leave messages for him. And what she wants to discu

n is going to be an interview with questions and answers that then get published verbatim. So to the extent that there are particular emails where Sharon provided advice to that doesn't transform the overall relationship from reporter and source to adviser and advisee or friend. Reporters communica

ld solve many of the problems that we 11 just talked about, however. 12 Okay. Where are we? Yes. Evidence of Maxwell's 13 involvement. 14 MR. CASSELL: Is this 686? 15 THE COURT: Yes. 16 MR. CASSELL: Yes, your Honor. Paul Cassell for 17 Ms. I'm arguing this motion. 18 As you know, the motio

ay. Where are we? Yes. Evidence of Maxwell's 13 involvement. 14 MR. CASSELL: Is this 686? 15 THE COURT: Yes. 16 MR. CASSELL: Yes, your Honor. Paul Cassell for 17 Ms. I'm arguing this motion. 18 As you know, the motion was an affirmative motion to 19 avoid disputes arising in the middle of trial,

p it out. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00794519 (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794520 78 H3ulgiva 1 It also was a part of her story in those Sharon 2 Churcher articles, your Honor now has in a book in front of 3 you, that we talked about a little bit earlier, so it is 4 plaintiff who public

ntiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. 16 MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. 17 S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff 18 BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. 19 HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA, ESQ. LAURA A. MENNINGER, ESQ. 21 22 23 24 25

ive value that's past 8 sexual assault that Ms. experienced as a child is 9 completely swallowed by the prejudicial effect on the jury. 10 MR. CASSELL: Your Honor, I think I'm the next one up. 11 For purposes of clarity, we're up to point number 7 in our 12 omnibus motion. 13 This one I think

and that's 17 important, your Honor. 18 Moreover, plaintiff is the one who told Sharon 19 Churcher about her own problems with school. She told Sharon 20 Churcher, and Sharon Churcher published with her authorization 21 that she went back to school to get her GED, and she wanted to 22 study fo

:44 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWI

ial as Pn § See Excerpts of Roberts’s Deposition Transcript, attached hereto (under seal) as Exhibit F.' i TT eee Pe See id.; see also March 2, 2011, Sharon Churcher, Daily Mail, attached hereto as Exhibit G. Dershowitz has also discovered that Roberts ee Sec Exhibit F; see also AD-006931-006933, Trans

howitz has repeatedly referred to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015621 --- PAGE BREAK --- Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 2 of 20 these documents, not only in defamatory statements broadc

agent since the sev- enties. He claimed to h d the careers of Monica Bel- lucci, Estelle, Jerry Hall, Rachel Hunter, Romijn, Kristina Semenovskaya, Sharon ren, as well as Christy Turlington an girls, Brunel had also been a su tion, broadcast in 1988, into sexual expl industry. That exposé had caused

essor named Paul Cassell, he had Gled a lawsuit on behalf of another unnamed woman. Six years later, that case is still pending, and now, Edwards and Cassell i petition to have the two suits combined. Allin all, four Jane Does take part in the lawsuit. Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts, the girl who says th

young, suggestible woman who was other unnamed woman. Six years interested in money,” Dershowitz says. “This is a disbarrable g, and now, Edwards and Cassell J offense, and they will be disbarred. They will rue the day the -ontined. a ever made this false charge against me.” It’s a vehement seals. ake part i