Epstein Secrets

—and we needn't do so even in this case. We cite Professor Cassell's article here (and elsewhere) for several reason

agreement that these "proceeding"-focused rights apply only after the filing of a complaint or criminal charges. See Reply in Supp. of Pet. at 17; Paul G. Cassell, et aL, Crime Picini's' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed, 104 J. of

they assert that the term "case" can "refer both to a judicial case before a court and an investigative case pursued by a law enforcement officer," Cassell et al., supra, at 72 (emphasis added).9 Although it's true, at least in the abstract, that the term "case" can mean either thing, in legal parlanc

provisions. It Hardison v. Cohen, 375 F.3d 1262, 1266 (11th Cir. 2004); Nichols v. Ho per 173 F.3d 820, 824 (11th Cir. 1999); C e Ala. Hosp Ass'n v Beasley, 702 £2d 955, 962 (1 I th Cir. 1983) (in light of statutory violation, we "accordingly remand to the district court so that it may devise an appro

course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court making "a specific finding of mis

Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's

rts to fashion appropriate equitable remedies when plaintiffs have proven a violation of statutory provisions. See, e.g., Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. Beasley, 702 F.2d 955, 962 (11th Cir. 1983) (in light of statutory violation, we "accordingly remand to the district court so that it may devise an appropr

course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court making "a specific finding of mis

Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's

urts to fashion appropriate equitable remedies when plaintiffs have proven a violation of statutory provisions. See, e.g., Alabama Hospital Ass'nl. Beasley, 702 F.2d 955, 962 (11th Cir. 1983) (in light of statutory violation, we "accordingly remand to the district court so that it may devise an appropr

ida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Pa.ul G. Cassell meant for India the Crime Victims Rihis uit,

1:361 *She was later given additional responsibility for mai-teeing opposition business in the House of Representatives by Latham, who had succeeded Beasley as Labor Party leader.WLA EFTA00262568 1ST Aire-me T (900 IN‘)c.n..A.e.D A Car.)SetP.ED LAW-1,ER ‘rnio %NIA:, IN--c.t.t.Zoir4nivitioAt.. 4 coh