Epstein Secrets

75 E-mail: brad ®pathtojustice.com and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: brad ®pathtojustice.com and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile:

ims advanced by crime victims that federal prosecutors have violated their public responsibilities under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. See U.S. v. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805, 817 (1984) (refusing to extend work product privilege to public accountants, because they have 'a public responsibility transcending

order to that effect is attached to this pleading. DATED: August 1, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice I0 EFTA00208765 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 218 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2013 Page 11 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I cert

dley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice I0 EFTA00208765 Case 9:08-cv-80

aims advanced by crime victims that federal prosecutors have violated their public responsibilities under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. See U.S.,. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805, 817 (1984) (refusing to extend work product privilege to public accountants, because they have "a public responsibility transcending

aims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box 3 P-013925 Thru P-013927 Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten correction Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; No

075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 1 EFTA00179619 Case 9:08-cv-807

ims advanced by crime victims that federal prosecutors have violated thcir public responsibilities under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. See U.S. v. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805, 817 (1984) (refusing to extend work product privilege to public accountants, because they have 'a public responsibility transcending