Epstein Secrets

, cooperation does not mean agreeing to facts that are not relevant to the resolution of the legal dispute at issue .... Letter from Wifredo A. to Paul G. Cassell (March 15, 2011). 17. Accordingly, unable to work with the Government to reach a resolution of the facts, on March 21, 2011, the victims filed a Mo

U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida regarding this case in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, Florida. At on that date, Professor Cassell presented a letter to the U.S. Attorney, Mr. M , asking him to personally investigate what happened during the Epstein prosecution and how the vict

ney's Office in Miami, Florida. At on that date, Professor Cassell presented a letter to the U.S. Attorney, Mr. M ,

on May 30, 2008 (Ex. 5). 4. Throughout the investigation, the Fill agents, the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, and your A ffiant had contact with C.W. and S.R. Attorney Edwards' other client. T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly. all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. T

ss Specialist. Attached hereto arc copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M.. C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).

Jay Howell & Associates PA 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville , FL 32211 Email: [email protected] PRO HAC VICE [Service via CM/ECF] Paul G. Cassell Email: [email protected] [Service via CM/ECF] EFTA00184223

.com PRO HAC VICE [Service via CM/ECF] Paul G. Cassell Email: [email protected] [Service via CM/EC

In October 2007, shortly after the agreement was signed, four victims were contacted and these provisions were discussed. One of those victims was C.W. who at the time was not represented, and she was given notice of the agreement. Notice was also provided of an expected change of plea in October 2

ess Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your A Mantis letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).

s responded by letter dated July 17, 2008, which is attached. He has enlisted the aid of Jay Howell, who is a victim rights advocate, and Professor Paul Cassell, former U.S. District Judge, who Is now a law professor with a strong interest in victims' rights. Edwards makes a number of requests in the letter

is a victim rights advocate, and Professor Paul Cassell, former U.S. District Judge, who Is now a law pro

regard to C.W., FBI Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richardson met with her in September 2007 to advise her of the agreement reached in state court. C.W. claims she understood them to mean the federal proceeding was still a possibility. I think we have little to gain by trying to reach an agreement o

n evidentiary hearing is necessary. We don't dispute that none of the victims were notified of the impending agreement with Epstein. With regard to C.W., FBI Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richardson met with her in September 2007 to advise her of the agreement reached in state court. C.W. claims she

Paul G. Cassell, Esquire, at email address: cassellpillaw.utah.edu,. WHEREFORE, Brad Edwards, Esquire, moves this Court to enter an Order permitting Paul G. Cassell to appear before this Court on behalf of Jane Doe, for all purposes relating to the proceedings in the above-styled matter and directing the Clerk t

ention the federal non-prosecution agreement to this counsel and that you did not mention that a plea agreement had already been reached. Professor Cassell has spoken to Meg Garvin, Esq., at the National Crime Victims' Law Institute, and that is her recollection of the events. 7. I think that your pro

that a plea agreement had already been reached. Professor Cassell has spoken to Meg Garvin, Esq., at the National

r victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these provisions were discussed" (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement ....." (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted a

STOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Bradley J. Edwards Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University o

they could bring their concerns to your attention. Very truly yours, FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Bradley J. Edwards Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah• BJE: mwk Enclosures This daytime business address is provided for identification and corre

eems to assert that Petitioner was given some sort of notice about tF.e plea agreement about nine months ago. Gov't Response at 7 ("in October 2007, C.W. was not represented by counsel. . . . She was given telephonic notice of the agreement, as were three other to EFTA00210782 Case 9:08-cv-80736-K

h Circuit Court on April 18 2014, ruled In favor of two crime victims represented by Farmer Jaffe WelteJng Partner Brad Edwards and his co-counsel. Paul Cassell F0 watt:aft litter...se PRCoy (PresTReleiso)• Apr. 22, 2014 • FORT LAUDERDALE, FM. - Contact Brad Edwards. Farmer. Jails Weissing. Edwards. Philo

mmen! that resulted In the goiemmant electing not to Federally prosecute Epstein lor his many sexual crimes against children. Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argued the case bolero the Elmonlh Circuit in February. against attorneys Roy Black and Marlin Weinberg The case in oleos a federal criminal in ati

eference to the ages of the minor victims and, upon conviction, did not require sex offender registration. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. Both were victims of Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. Bo

, 20114:51 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Janes Does 1 and 2 v. United States - March 1, 2011 Conference Call with Cassell and MI, At 11:30 a.m. today, M, =, and I spoke with Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards on a conference call regarding the posture of the case. told

) Subject: Janes Does 1 and 2 v. United States - March 1, 2011 Conference Call with Cassell and MI, At 11:30 a.m. today, M, =, and I spoke with Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards on a conference call regarding the posture of the case. told them we had spoken with officials at the DOJ, and the government was

ited States Attorney was a public official. I expect you will be receiving a letter soon seeking access and disclosure of information pertaining to C.W. and T.M. Edwards said he would be sending us a draft statement of facts and their legal memorandum in the next few days. Cassell again mentioned th

CIV- United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 54 EFTA00230119 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docum

f the proposed "undisputed material facts" are in fact disputed and, in many cases, wrong. 2The U.S. Attorney's Office also repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct

r victims [including C.W.J were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above

rman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 E-mail: bradarloathtoiustice.com Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 841 12 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: ca

f the proposed "undisputed material facts" are in fact disputed and, in many cases, wrong. 2The U.S. Attorney's Office also repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct

r victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above