Epstein Secrets

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:9-25) (emphasis added). Paul Cassell, the Intervenors' counsel, asked that a similar r

t representation, as Mr. Scarola has accepted those representations during the hearing as well. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:9-25) (emphasis added). Paul Cassell, the Intervenors' counsel, asked that a similar representation be made by Fowler White. In response, the Court referenced a "blanket confidentiality

ief. If merely referencing the documents' existence is a violation of the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. In fact, the challenged statements are appr

t representation, as Mr. Scarola has accepted those representations during the hearing as well. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:9-25) (emphasis added). Paul Cassell, the Intervenors' counsel, asked that a similar representation be made by Fowler White. In response, the Court referenced a "blanket confidentiality

(3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 78:9-25) (emphasis added). Paul Cassell, the Intervenors' counsel, asked that a similar r

ief. If merely referencing the documents' existence is a violation of the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. Not once has Epstein or his counsel violate

in appellate proceedings; communications with P. Cassell re proposed sealing order and no authority to ad

ling Order, work on preparations for April 4, 2018, UMC hearing on B. Edwards' Motion to Change Case Style and Case Management; review B. Edwards' Motion for Sanctions; work on Response to Motion to Show Cause in Bankruptcy; follow up with bankruptcy counsel and D. Indyke re same; review Motions to Strike filed i