. #444) is DENIED; and 2 EFTA00728572 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 554 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2010 Page 3 of 3 (2) Defendant Epstein's Motion for Sanctions (D.E. #450) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this June 1, 2010, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R.J9Dt SON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE J

iew excluded trial exhibits to narrow down on Amended Exhibit List; work on Motion to Compel B. Edwards to Identify Witnesses; work on Response to Motion for Sanctions 05/02/18 PVD [No Charge] Proof Motion to Compel B. Edwards to Identify Witnesses prior to filing; continue review of Clerk's Trial Exhibits for c

s; meet with R. Glasser re Motion to Strike Requested Relief in bankruptcy proceeding; work on same Work on Response in Opposition to B. Edwards' Motion for Sanctions; follow up on Response to Motion to Dismiss; work on preparations for upcoming hearings Work on multiple rounds of revision to our Response to B.

ling Order, work on preparations for April 4, 2018, UMC hearing on B. Edwards' Motion to Change Case Style and Case Management; review B. Edwards' Motion for Sanctions; work on Response to Motion to Show Cause in Bankruptcy; follow up with bankruptcy counsel and D. Indyke re same; review Motions to Strike filed i

. Glasser re Motion to Strike Requested Relief in bankruptcy proceeding; work on same 06/06/18 TLC Work on Response in Opposition to B. Edwards' Motion for Sanctions; follow up on Response to Motion to Dismiss; work on preparations for upcoming hearings 06/06/18 SJL Work on multiple rounds of revision to our R

ief. If merely referencing the documents' existence is a violation of the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. Not once has Epstein or his counsel violate

ief. If merely referencing the documents' existence is a violation of the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. In fact, the challenged statements are appr

From: Lesley Groff <MIMIII > To: Jefffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Confidentiality Agreement and Motion for Sanctions Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:14:05 +0000 Attachments: CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT 3-8-2011.docx in case you needed to see as well Begin forwarded messag

L Re: B.B. v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Case No. 502008CA037319XXXX MBAB 1/26/10, 8:10 a.m. - 30-minute Special Set Hearing on Defendant Epstein's Motion for Sanctions against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. and Alternative Motion to Identify Dear Judge Hafele: With reference to the above-mentioned 30-minute special set hear

450.00 04/02/2009 RDC Continued work re: cases and what is outstanding and responses needed 1.10 hr $550.00 04/02/2009 RDC Letter re: Sid #2; Motion for Sanctions re: discovery 0.70 hr $350.00 04/02/2009 RDC Letter to Sid re: new Federal and directions; to do 0.40 hr $200.00 04/02/2009 RDC Telephone c