Epstein Secrets

JOHNSON Attorneys for Defendant Robert Deweese Critton, Jr. [email protected] Michael James Plke Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman Lead Counsel Paul G. Cassell Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Co-Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley James Edwards Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Le

Critton Luttier & Coleman Lead Counsel Paul G. Cassell Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Wei

ion that civil and criminal cases proceed together." United States ex reL Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 761 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted). Epstein has shown no good reason for deviating from normal practice here. One last reason weighing against a

a stay only after that defendant has been indicted." United States ex rel. Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Cam North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura v. Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil proc

Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Blvd Suite 1650 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-522-3456 954-527-8663 (fax) [email protected] Lead Counsel Paul G. Cassell 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 (fax) [email protected] Pro Hac Vice Jay C. Howell Jay Howe

fax) [email protected] Lead Counsel Paul G. Cassell 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 8

on that civil and criminal cases proceed together." United States ex rel. Gonzalez I. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 761 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted). Epstein has shown no good reason for deviating from normal practice here. One last reason weighing against a

stay only after that defendant has been indicted." United States ex rel. Gonzalez I. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil procee

02-DB-EJF Document 20 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION In re: SUBPOENA TO PAUL G. CASSELL Underlying case: VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER T

in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 21, 2015). (ECF No. 2.) Ms. Maxwell opposes the Motion to Quash. (ECF No. 8.) Mr. Cassell replied. (ECF No. 19.) On June 28, 2016, the Court heard oral argument on the motion. Having read the parties' submissions, heard oral argument, an

urisdiction over the underlying case is a non-dispositive matter. Elliott v. Mission Trust Servs., LLC, No. SA-14-MC-942-XR, 2014 WL 6772474, at *2 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 1, 2014) (unpublished); EFTA_R1_00012379 EFTA01734383 Case 2:16-mc-00602-DB-EJF Document 20 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 5 see also San Juan C