Epstein Secrets

Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 26 EFTA0

.L. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

"Disclosure to an adversary waives the work product protection as to items actually disclosed, even where disclosure occurs in settlement." In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litigation, 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988). Thus, "[c]ourts will imply waiver when a party In Jane Doe v. Epstein,

good transcending the normally predominant prin- ciple of utilizing all rational means for ascertaining truth. Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 501, 28 U.S.C.A. Paul Cassell, University of Utah College of Law, Salt Lake Cty, UT, Bradley James Edwards, Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehman, PL, Fort Lauderdale, FL

ruth. Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 501, 28 U.S.C.A. Paul Cassell, University of Utah College of Law, Salt Lake Cty

voluntarily States during the plea negotiations is not work-product materials to an adversary waives the work-product privilege. See, e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig., 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir.1988); In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081-82 (4th Cir.1981). Even if it shared the com

my Crime Victims' Rights Act... Page 1 of 3 Print Eleventh Circuit rules that discovery can move forward on my Crime Victims' Rights Act case By Paul Cassell Updated: April 21 at 9:41 am On Friday the 1 1 th Circuit ruled that discovery can move forward in an important Crime Victims' Rights Act case that

sentence. in a vacant wing of the Palm Beach County Stockade, and was lel out on work release six days a week for up to 16 hours a day. Edwards and Cassell represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, who say the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by signing the federal non-pr

use plea discussions are not confidential: Disclosure of work-product materials to an adversary waives the work-product privilege. See, e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig., 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988); In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081-82 (4th Cir. 1981). Even if it shared the co

ceedings. we will be able to prove that clear violation of the CVRA and then obtain the remedy of invalidating the illegally-negotiated plea deal. Paul G. Cassell teaches criminal law, criminal procedure. and crime victims' rights at the.. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. Before coming to Utah

at the case will ultimately set an important precedent that federal prosecutors can't keep victims in the dark about the plea deals that they reach? Cassell said. Epstein served 13 months of an 18-month sentence on the prostitution charge. sold his Palm Beach home in 2011 and now divides his time betwee

e plea discussions are not confidential: Disclosure of work-product materials to an adversary• waives the work-product privilege. See. e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig.. 86012.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988); In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073. 1081-82 (4th Cir. 1981). Even if it shared the com

h Circuit Court on April 18 2014, ruled In favor of two crime victims represented by Farmer Jaffe WelteJng Partner Brad Edwards and his co-counsel. Paul Cassell F0 watt:aft litter...se PRCoy (PresTReleiso)• Apr. 22, 2014 • FORT LAUDERDALE, FM. - Contact Brad Edwards. Farmer. Jails Weissing. Edwards. Philo

mmen! that resulted In the goiemmant electing not to Federally prosecute Epstein lor his many sexual crimes against children. Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argued the case bolero the Elmonlh Circuit in February. against attorneys Roy Black and Marlin Weinberg The case in oleos a federal criminal in ati

ed, for example, the work product argument: Disclosure of work-product materials to an adversarywaives the work-product privilege. See, e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig., 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988); In re Doe, 662 F2d 1073, 1081-82 (4th Cir. 1981). Even if it shared the com