Epstein Secrets

t is not us that is inserting that info into public pleadings. We need to feature your privacy interests - which will lead, inexorably, to a further Cassell attack saying you have no reputational interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra all the good

to a further Cassell attack saying you have no reputational interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra all the good you've done since this case that would be at risk if this historic (and presumptively private stuff) gets to public is something we sh

t is not us that is inserting that info into public pleadings. We need to feature your privacy interests - which will lead, inexorably, to a further Cassell attack saying you have no reputationsl interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra all the good

to a further Cassell attack saying you have no reputationsl interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra all the good you've done since this case that would be at risk if this historic (and presumptively private stuff) gets to public is something we sh

, they are just waiting for either J Marra to reso ve a I the open discovery issues (their 14,000 withheld pgs with 6E and privilege issues) or for Cassell to file (after all these years) his motion for summary judgment. When the e to do an answer, and there is a reason for a call to discuss issues, an

nberg < > wrote: Will do. The timing is not right for me to call - she (or Dexter) have no due dates, no issues, they are just waiting for either J Marra to reso ve a I the open discovery issues (their 14,000 withheld pgs with 6E and privilege issues) or for Cassell to file (after all these years) his

deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the C

d against you. I would expect that Edwards would do whatever he could to insert the article into the CVRA case even before the remedy phase to anger J Marra (and attempt thru subpoena to pursue discovery from the reporter eg his notes of interviews with you). The reporter wants to speak with you again, i

Ann Sanchez" EFTA00627607 Date: Friday, March 18, 2011, 5:11 PM Previously we discussed intervention in this case and decided not to. In light of Paul Casssell's and Brad Edward's efforts to use these materials we should reconsider. I have previously sent you my emails to and from Paul. Joe (Description: D

rch 18, 2011, 5:25 PM Lets see what is filed, what remedies they are seeking, whether they are seeking to unseal etc. My own intuitive view is that J Marra would only consider a remedy adverse to JE (as contrasted to the likely remedy against the USAO or a decl judgment that different 3771 standards mus