Epstein Secrets

, The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: cas

020 (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University o

d information should be privileged under a common law plea negotiations privilege. In addition, in their initial briefing and at oral argument, the Intervenors argued that the communications were governed by the attorney work-product privilege. ARGUMENT A. The Petitioners Appear to Be Seeking to Use the

ds Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Counsel for Farmer Ja,ffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, a Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 casse11p08aw.utah.edu Peter E. Sha

Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, a Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of

the Intervenors' Depositions and to Compel their Mental Examinations (Epstein's "Motion") (D.E. 6440), and states: INTRODUCTION Inexplicably, the Intervenors' counsel insists on making the Intervenors relive (and attempt to re-litigate) their settled sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Although t

, The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: cas

020 (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University o

d information should be privileged under a common law plea negotiations privilege. In addition, in their initial briefing and at oral argument, the Intervenors argued that the communications were governed by the attorney work-product privilege. ARGUMENT A. The Petitioners Appear to Be Seeking to Use the

f proof. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EFTA00205765 t with the Cler to receive noti Brad Edwards, Esq., Paul G. Cassell a ttorneys or ane oe an ane Doe # 2 Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. ' P.A. EFTA00205766 Attorneys for Intervenors Jeffrey Epstein, Ro

r to receive noti Brad Edwards, Esq., Paul G. Cassell a ttorneys or ane oe an ane Doe # 2 Roy Blac

and information should be privileged under a common law plea negotiations privilege. In addition, in its initial briefing and at oral argument, the Intervenors argued that the communications were governed by the attorney work-product privilege. ARGUMENT A. The Petitioners Appear to Be Seeking to Use the P

ldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell ' S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University St. Salt Lake Ci UT 84112-073 tifi , j thiailed Intervenor Co-Co o

laintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell ' S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Universit

ds, Epstein and a repr m Farmer Jaffe who has the full authority to settle without further consultation shall app at the mediation in person. The Intervenors' counsel, who shall have full authority to settle the matter without further consultation, shall appear at the mediation by telephone. FILED: PALM

h Circuit Court on April 18 2014, ruled In favor of two crime victims represented by Farmer Jaffe WelteJng Partner Brad Edwards and his co-counsel. Paul Cassell F0 watt:aft litter...se PRCoy (PresTReleiso)• Apr. 22, 2014 • FORT LAUDERDALE, FM. - Contact Brad Edwards. Farmer. Jails Weissing. Edwards. Philo

mmen! that resulted In the goiemmant electing not to Federally prosecute Epstein lor his many sexual crimes against children. Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argued the case bolero the Elmonlh Circuit in February. against attorneys Roy Black and Marlin Weinberg The case in oleos a federal criminal in ati

ed on Rule 501 on the ground that Congress has already addressed the issue in Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(0 and Fed. R. Evid. 410 and likewise rejected the Intervenors' request that the Court recognize a privilege for plea negotiation communications. Id. at 8-9. The Intervenors appealed the Court's ruling to the E