Epstein Secrets

02-DB-EJF Document 20 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION In re: SUBPOENA TO PAUL G. CASSELL Underlying case: VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER T

in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 21, 2015). (ECF No. 2.) Ms. Maxwell opposes the Motion to Quash. (ECF No. 8.) Mr. Cassell replied. (ECF No. 19.) On June 28, 2016, the Court heard oral argument on the motion. Having read the parties' submissions, heard oral argument, an

Benson Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse Paul G. Cassell moves this Court to quash a subpoena issued to him by the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 21, 2015). (ECF No. 2.) Ms. Maxwell opposes the Motion to Quash. (ECF No. 8.) Mr. Cassell replied. (EC

stency, fairness, and efficiency to all parties to this Motion and the underlying litigation. Therefore, this Court ORDERS the Motion TRANSFERRED to Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv- 07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 21, 2015). Virginia L. Giuffre filed the underlying case in September 2015. The parties have heavily

nses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could be.I139) v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims fiE Mgr, are °JEW-9°Y? The Rights Act isl.vsiiii,5401 I (then known as : PISJOast PlaYFSPI the Jeffrey

rida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims fiE Mg

ircuit.rI91 On March 11, 2019, in the appeal of the district judge's refusal to unseal the documents relating to • the 2017 defamation settlement of Giuffre v. Maxwell, the Second Circuit Court gave parties one week to provide good cause as to why they should remain under seal, without which they would be unsealed

left open what the possible remedy could be.E1393 Virginia Giuffre v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims Where are they now? The Rights • Act lawsuit,[mcd Virginia Giuffre (then known as biggest players in the

h rminated and he Dershowitz denied the allegations in Giuffre's statement and sought disbarment of the lawyers filing the snail-U/11M Edwards and Cassell sued Dershowitz for defamation in January 2015; he countersued. U The two parties settled in 2016 for an undisclosed financial sum. pia] Epstein sue

ircuit.1i531 On March it, 2019, in the appeal of the district judge's refusal to unseal the documents relating to the 2017 defamation settlement of Giuffre v. Maxwell, the Second Circuit Court gave parties one week to provide good cause as to why they should remain under seal, without which they would be unsealed

CVRA case in which she discussed her sex trafficking by Epstein. On December 31, 2014, Plaintiff's lawyers in the CVRA proceeding (Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell) filed a Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in the Action ("Joinder Motion") on behalf of Plaintiff. Plaintiff's joinder motion described how s

lawyers in the CVRA actions, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. Defendant, in nationally televised news interviews, wrongfully claimed that Edwards and Cassell had engaged in unethical behavior warranting disbarment for filing the Joinder Motion that described Defendant's involvement with Epstein and Plaint

e. She's made up the whole story. There is no truth to it." (t) August 12, 2019, in a press statement issued after the Second Circuit's ruling in Giuffre v. Maxwell: "She invented the false accusation against me only in 2014, when her lawyers `pressured' her to do so for financial reasons."2° (u) August 30, 201

by Bradley Edwards External video and p4.14 G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims yvhcre

nd Circuit.M On March 11, 2019, in the appeal of the district judge's refusal to unseal the documents relating to the 2017 defamation settlement of Giuffre v. Maxwell, the Second Circuit Court gave parties one week to provide good cause as to why they should remain under seal, without which they would be unsealed