Epstein Secrets

EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel: (954 524-2820• Fax: 954 524-2822 E-mail: Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Tel: (801) 585-5202. Fax: (801) 58

954 524-2820• Fax: 954 524-2822 E-mail: Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

plaintiff had the right to examine the investigation materials to determine if O'Quinn's reliance upon them was reasonable. Stern also relied upon Volpe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D. Fla. 1998), where the plaintiff sued defendant U.S. Airways for sexual harassment. U.S. Airways asserted

ST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek B

Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

plaintiff had the right to examine the investigation materials to determine if O'Quinn's reliance upon them was reasonable. Stern also relied upon Volpe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D. Fla. 1998), where the plaintiff sued defendant U.S. Airways for sexual harassment. U.S. Airways asserted

FE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Telephon Facsimile E-mail: And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah' 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake it T 4112 Telephon Facsi E-Mai Attorneys for J

33301 Telephon Facsimile E-mail: And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the

.1996); Tribune Co. v. Purcigliotti, 1997 WL 10924, *6 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 1997)). As an illustration of how the doctrine operates, this Court cited Volpe v. U.S. Ainvays, Inc., 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D.Fla.1998). As this Court explained, in Volpe, the plaintiff sued the defendant, alleging employment disc