Epstein Secrets

—and we needn't do so even in this case. We cite Professor Cassell's article here (and elsewhere) for several reason

agreement that these "proceeding"-focused rights apply only after the filing of a complaint or criminal charges. See Reply in Supp. of Pet. at 17; Paul G. Cassell, et aL, Crime Picini's' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed, 104 J. of

they assert that the term "case" can "refer both to a judicial case before a court and an investigative case pursued by a law enforcement officer," Cassell et al., supra, at 72 (emphasis added).9 Although it's true, at least in the abstract, that the term "case" can mean either thing, in legal parlanc

t an independent grant of appellate jurisdiction" but, rather, "'may go only in aid of appellate jurisdiction' that exists on some other basis." 16 Wright & Miller, supra, § 3932 (quoting Parr v. United States, 351 U.S. 513, 520, 76 S.Ct. 912, 100 L.Ed. 1377 (1956)). The "minimum condition" for mandamus relief

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

aintiffs generally rely on treatise material from Wright & Miller, 8 Federal Practice & Procedure Civ.2d, §2041, a

discussed. Moreover, in an effort to facilitate contact on these issues, the same day that filed his motion to intervene (May 3), victims' counsel (Cassell) sent an e-mail to requesting an opportunity to talk with him about his role in the Epstein case. The next day (May 4), sent a letter back refusin

. DATED: May 17, 2011 7 motion to intervene in Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 EFTA00205017 Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Th

create unwieldy " `satellite litigation"' that will frustrate the rule's goal of 'more effective operation of the pleading regimen.' Id. (citing 5A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1332, at 29 (1990)). motion is also untimely. On March 20, 2011, the victims filed their motion for summary judgm

February 6.2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for the victims This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not i

G, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for the victims This da

pursuing a damages action against the government for violation of the [CVRA], and there is no implied private right of action under the [CVRA]." 3B Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Proc. Crim. § 932 (4th ed. 2014); see 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6) ("Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize a cause of acti

. Moreover, in an effort to facilitate contact on these issues, the same day that Reinhart filed his motion to intervene (May 3), victims' counsel (Cassell) sent an e-mail to Reinhart requesting an opportunity to talk with him about his role in the Epstein case. The next day (May 4), Reinhart sent a le

WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 6 EFTA00795279 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)16.2011 Page 7 of 8 and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The foregoi

create unwieldy " `satellite litigation' that will frustrate the rule's goal of `more effective operation of the pleading regimen.' Id. (citing 5A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1332, at 29 (1990)). Reinhart's motion is also untimely. On March 20, 2011, the victims filed their motion for su

ge No. 26 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Counsel for Plaintiff Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger

derdale, FL 33301 Counsel for Plaintiff Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

ht to relief above the speculative level, see 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1216, pp. 235-236 (3d ed.2004) (hereinafter Wright & Miller) ("Mlle pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement of facts that merely creates a suspicion [ofj a legally cognizable right of a

t Of Motion In Limine To Exclude In Toto Certain Depositions Designated By Plaintiff For Use At Trial via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Paul G. Cassell Meredith Schultz 383 S. University Street BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake it UT 4112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Laude

CF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Paul G. Cassell Meredith Schultz 383 S. University Street BOLE

m and foundation. 3 EFTA00595615 THE WITNESS: Yes. He wasn't always friendly See Menninger Decl., Ex. F, 10:6-14; 43:15-44:4 As explained in in Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedures, the use of a document during testimony to refresh recollections is limited: The law also places limits on how cou

win Paul M. Krieger ICRIEGER KIM & LEWIN, LLP 500 Fifth Avenue New York. NY 10110 this Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support of Her on the following: Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Imran H. Ansari AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, P.C. 546 Fifth Avenue 6th Floor New York, NY 10036

ply In Support of Her on the following: Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 841

ct of amendment on the parties, the court must consider "the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute." 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 1488, p. 814 (3d ed. 2010). Justice does not require amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will no

e 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax: 954-527-8663 bedwardaarra-law.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Sac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax gassellaillaw.utahedu Co-counsel for Plai

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Sac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

to prevent the Defendant from being present in the room where the Plaintiffs arc being deposed, Plaintiffs generally rely on treatise material from Wright & Miller, 8 asicral Practice & ?Paco:lure Civ.2d, §2041, and cases cited therein. The case of Gaella v. OnaSsis, 487 F.2d 986, at 997 (2d CG. 1973). cited by

ds, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: Fax: 80893 n Related Case No. 08- Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake Ci , UT 84112 Im A itsgr Fax o-cowue or inn Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia La

one: Fax: 80893 n Related Case No. 08- Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

to prevent the Defendant from being present in the room where the Plaintiffs are being deposed, Plaintiffs generally rely on treatise material from Wright & Miller, 8 Federal Practice & Procedure Civ.2d, §2041, and cases cited therein. The case of Oaella v. Onassis 487 F.2d 986, at 997 (2d Cr. 1973), cited by