Epstein Secrets

n 7 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plain

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 S

ion of confidential information without conducting an in camera review to determine whether the assertion of privilege is valid. See Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). 8. If disclosure is made, this court should then determine what portions of th

3301 Phone:954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 [email protected] Cmailto: [email protected] for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 560 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/201

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

on of confidential information without conducting an in camera review to determine whether the assertion of privilege is valid. See Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). 7. Moreover, the right to privacy encompasses at least two different kinds of

r Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

425 N. Andrews Ave. Suite #2 Fort LanderdAle FT. 11301 Phone Fax: Cmailto:bedwardserra-law.comounse/for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Tara A. Finnigan, Esq. Garcia

on of confidential information without conducting an in camera review to determine whether the assertion of privilege is valid. See Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). 6,7. Moreover, the right to privacy encompasses at least two different kinds o

public attention.' Nothing could be further from the truth. This case began when Jane Doe No. 3 and her lawyers, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Paul G. Cassell ("Cassell"), made a deliberate decision to file a pleading in a federal lawsuit accusing Dershowitz of committing a heinous crime: sexually abusing

Nothing could be further from the truth. This case began when Jane Doe No. 3 and her lawyers, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Paul G. Cassell ("Cassell"), made a deliberate decision to file a pleading in a federal lawsuit accusing Dershowitz of committing a heinous crime: sexually abusing a minor. J

determine whether the requesting party establishes a need for the information that outweighs the privacy rights of the non-party." Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 14 EFTA00582662 So.3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Assuming that the testimony and information sought in the sub

ublic attention.' Nothing could be further from the truth. This case began when Jane Doe No. 3 and her lawyers, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Paul G. Cassell ("Cassell"), made a deliberate decision to file a pleading in a federal lawsuit accusing Dershowitz of committing a heinous crime: sexually abusing

Nothing could be further from the truth. This case began when Jane Doe No. 3 and her lawyers, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Paul G. Cassell ("Cassell"), made a deliberate decision to file a pleading in a federal lawsuit accusing Dershowitz of committing a heinous crime: sexually abusing a minor. J

determine whether the requesting party establishes a need for the information that outweighs the privacy rights of the non-party." Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So.3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Assuming that the testimony and information sought in the subpoena is, in fact,