Epstein Secrets

using CM/ECF. is/Dexter . Lee 31 EFTA00211748 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. ~It Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 3 Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSP

G, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. ~It Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 3 Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Ja

prosecuted. In American jurisprudence, "a private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another." Linda R.S.1. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973). Simply put, Epstein's state plea under the NPA could not extinguish any victim's right to prosecution s

ICALABUSE GUYS? WHY DAVID? SIGRID? Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Monday, 24 February 2025 at 13:06, wrote: SIGRID, DAVID, BRAD, BRITNEY, PAUL CASSELL JENNIFER FREEMAN, I PRSUME YOU HAVE NOT BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS LITIGATION. IF YOU HAVE AND HAVE SAID ONE BAD THING ABOUT ME TO ANY SINGLE HUMAN BEI

AMAL CLOONEY'S HUSBAND IS SHE TOO SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND INVESTIGATED! On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:38, To The FCA, DAVID BOIES, SIGRID CASSELL > wrote: ENNIFER FREEDMAN, PAUL is a witness for you! Ask Jes Staley who is! Why is important JES STALEY!! PLEASE SEE EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ATT

SE CAN THE FCA AND SECURITIES EXCHANGE AND KASH PATEL INVESTIGATE !! Thanks for your email yesterday about the mental health fund I negotiated with Linda Singer myself. How extraordinary receiving an email after over year of you being included in every single email! So lease can you explain to me wh

for very, very high number of -- in dollars 1 4 5 4 s * Is II 12 13 IS Is 14 17 Is Is 20 21 22 23 24 25 35 But you do recall Paul Cassell 's involvement. What about other local lawyers? Wore there other local lawyers who were participants in the prosecution of she cases against Jeffrey

cases after he joined ARA. Be had already filed these cases, I believe. I know ho had shoe -- the ladies as clients before he joined the firm. And Cassell was co-counsel with him on those. So in terns of attorneys that were co-counsel wish ua, he was a co-counsel representing the three young woman th

at the age of ono year, my family moved to Miami • Beach, and I grew up on Miami. Hooch. 9 Q Do you have a family of your own now? 10 A Yea. Linda and I have been married for 47 IL years and we have three daughters. 12 Q Let's pick up with your graduation from law 1) 14 15 If 17 IS 1

enses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could be.T'391 v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims I6 Where. are they P9-w-li IN Rights- Act lawsuit,['401 I (then known as higgeat payers jn the Jeffrey

rida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims I6 Wher

SA. SEC:Police. SFC:PublIcInfie 4fritecoverv; SerReyer• sFescr; SEC:SES• parniard. Noel (SAM.); Dicimn. Paul (SAPOL)* Duval, Scott (SAPOL); FeIDtvs, Linda (SAPOI. ); e Peer a1xv i ; Newitt. Philip ($APOI ); Parrott Tan (SAPOLI; Stevens, Grant (SAPOL); Wants. Linda ISAPOLl; MOLeap. Stuart (SAPOL-Pla MI

int Tracking ID 826585042928 Sender Redolent Service Type FedEx bill Priority J EPSTEIN NAIDA COLE Package Type FedEx Pak JEFFREY E EPSTEIN CASSELL BROCK BLACKWELL Zone A 457 MADISON AVE Orig./Elea. JRWYB2 NEW YORK NY 100224809 US Pieces 1 Weighl 1.6 ts. 0.7 kgs Delivered Mar 07. 2001

0 to. 0.5 kgs Delivered Mar 19.2001 10:15 GHISLAINE MAXWELL JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK NY 1002243809 US Transportation Charge LINDA PINTO ALBERTO PINTO HOTEL DE LA VICTOME 42.10 Signed by .SALIMA Discount -1.26 Fuel Surcharge 1.63 Customs Entry Dale Mal 16.2001 Total Charge

ustified lethal force, see generally Heather Ann Thompson, Blood in the Water: The Attica Prison Uprising of 1971 and Its Legacy (2016). 41 Cf. Paul Cassell, Who Prosecutes the Police? Perceptions of Bias in Police Misconduct Investigations and a Possible Remedy, Wash. Post: Vololkh Conspiracy Blog (Dec.

on is an exclusive power of public officials in which private victims have no role or standing. See Malley v. Lane, 115 A. 674, 676 (Conn. 1921); cf. Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973) ("[A] citizen lacks standing to contest the policies of the prosecuting authority when he himself is nei

chments/2015/02/06/{v2014aprfv_20]6app2.pdf (describing aspects of the "Vulnerable People Priority Goal"). 46 See Lichtblau, supra note 141. 47 See Paul G. Cassell & James R. Marsh, Full Restitution for Child Pornography Victims: The Supreme Court's Paroline Decision and the Need for a Congressional Response, /3