Epstein Secrets

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

in of a crime. (DE 242, p. 18) United States v. Goodwin, 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir. 1980). 2 Case 9:

e #2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plai

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

he privilege raised as to these requests valid, and asserted by Epstein only with reference to 'genuinely threatening questions." United States v. Goodwin, 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5 th Cir. 1980). (DE 462 at p. 10-11) Based upon the foregoing, it is clear that this court made the correct ruling relative to

[email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz ahorow

[email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S

nected to a crime. A Fifth Amendment privilege can only be properly asserted with respect to “genuinely threatening questions.” United States v. Goodwin, 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir. 1980). Epstein’s concern appears to be not that he will be prosecuted for having money in a bank, but rather that thi

s Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room IOI 19 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2009 Page 20 of 20 Rich

08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room IOI

y threatening questions" which could furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to convict Epstein of a crime. (DE 242, p.18) United States v. Goodwin, 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir. 1980). b. The District Court Judge Court Should Reverse or Modify The Magistrate Judge's Order (DE 242) Relative to I

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

tein of a crime. (DE 242, p.18) United States v. Goodwin, 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir. 1980). 5. As detai

, Goodman, G. S., Eilertson, D., & Magnussen, S. (2004). Beliefs about child witnesses: A national survey. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 347-365. Castelli, P., Goodman, G. S., & Ghetti, S. (2005). Effects of interview style and witness age on perceptions of children's credibility in sexual abuse cases.

S. Ceci, M. Toglia, & D. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 1-23). New York Springer-Verlag. Corwin, D., Berliner, L., Goodman, G. S., Goodwin, J., & White, S. (1987). Child sexual abuse and custody disputes—No easy answers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 91-105. Goodman, G. S., & H

tus, E.F. (2000, April) The poet as brain mechanic: A 2050 version of physics for poets. Global Business Network Bulletin, p.1-5. Loftus, E. L. and Castelle, G. (2000) Crashing Memories in Legal Cases. In P.J. van Koppen & N.H.M. Roos (Eds). Rationality, Information and Progress in Law and Psychology. Ma

ional Academy of Sciences. 117, 4585-4589 Davis, D. & Loftus, E.F. (2020) Recovered memories and false memories. In Geddes J.R, Andreasen N.C. and Goodwin, G.M. (Eds). New Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry 3ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 884-893. Greenspan, R.L. & Loftus, E.F. (2020) Eyewitness

:44 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWI

howitz has repeatedly referred to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015621 --- PAGE BREAK --- Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 2 of 20 these documents, not only in defamatory statements broadc

, and steal. These are unethical lawyers. This is Professor Cassell who shouldn’t be allowed near a student. This is