Epstein Secrets

sealed. 20 185-13. It's a copy of Ms. May 30, 2016 21 affidavit. That can be unsealed in full. 22 185-14. Copy of deposition excerpts from Mr. Cassell. 23 Unseal. 24 185-15. Copy of a transcript of the Scarola/Edwards 25 interview of April 7, 2011. Unseal in full. The document is SOUTHERN DIS

es admitted into evidence in the trial of four of President Nixon's former advisors. The media intended to copy th

ell’ s tragic gay problem. Now, /e would have been a fine prospect for blackmail: “We have this photo of you and a friend in the men’ s room, Justice Carswell, but don’ t worry, we won’ t leak it.” | wonder, if | had been successful in appointing him to the Supreme Court, how would he have voted on the cons

An old friend approached us with a thick sheaf of what was purported to be a photocopy of the autobiographical manuscript on which former President Richard M. Nixon was still at work. Our first reaction was skepticism. While most of the contents dealt predictably with contemporary history as it has already been r

e eee rere oe wel rare otanelv ene Ccenias ees 13 Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., OS CUBR tay OLY.) En a

d Nadia Marcinkova, described by some victims as Epstein’s sex slave. Reinhart also pointed out that a complaint filed against him by victims’ lawyer Paul Cassell was dismissed by the Justice Department. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016449 --- PAGE BREAK --- Bruce E. Reinhart, Member, McDonald Hopkins LLC. (PRNewsFoto/Mc

mplaint filed against him by victims’ lawyer Paul Cassell was dismissed by the Justice Department. HOUSE_O

ates Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Nixon 734 might be vitiated by a broad rule. To ensure

ictims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules o Criminal Procedure 2007 Reporter 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861 * Length: 59852 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law, S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah, Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, 2002-07. Thanks to

in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 835, 852-924 [hereinafter Cassell, Proposed Amendments]. 5 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (a)(8). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017637 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 3 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *865

. P. 17(c)(Q). °4 See generally United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 689 (1974). 95 See id. at 699. D

inal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act 2005 Reporter 2005 B.Y.ULL. Rev. 835 * Length: 36451 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law for the S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah and United States District Court Judge for the District of Utah. T

hird Wave of Crime Victims' Rights: Standing, Remedy, and Review, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 255 [hereinafter Beloof, The Third Wave of Crime Victims' Rights]; Cassell, supra note 15, at 1381- 82. '7 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, Final Report 114 (1982). 18 Td. 19 Td. at 63. 20 Td. at 72-73. 21 Td.