Epstein Secrets

not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03638-03641 09/08/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

he admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02633-02646 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Response to Motion to Consolidate + Cassell strategy Memo for Jay Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admiss

to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02009-2010 09/09/2009 Pasquale Diaz Bradley J. Edwards Deposition of Bill Riley Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

3-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

he admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02633-02646 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Response to Motion to Consolidate + Cassell strategy Memo for Jay Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admiss

to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02009-2010 09/09/2009 Pasquale Diaz Bradley J. Edwards Deposition of Bill Riley Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

AK --- IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiff(s), vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant(s). / NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES Plaintiffs, Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cas

n referencing Dershowitz by name that Concern the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of the 2015 Jane Doe #3 Declaration. ANSWER: Edwards and Cassell lack sufficient information to determine all circumstances in which Jane Doe No. 3 has mentioned to others Dershowitz’s name as someone who abused he

mber that very well, and it was only about a week later I was called by his attorney. Who was it that contacted you, do you remember? I want to say Bill Riley, but he might have been from the FBI. No, it was Bill Riley. Bill Riley. Not sure if that’s his correct name, but that’s what is coming to mind What