Epstein Secrets

ttorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs. Sloman, Menchel and Lourie and Ms. Villafafia: We write as counsel to Jeffrey Epstein to follow-up on our meeting on June 26, 2007. We thought the meeting

awoom RENATO C. STABILE slabIle&elcourIlawcorn FAITH A. FRIEDMAN [email protected] BY FEDERAL EXPRESS TELEPHONE FACSIMILE July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern Distric

human cognition. Aaron Sloman's Cognition and Affect project has explored a space of architectures proposed as models for human minds; a sketch of Sloman's H-CogAff model is shown in figure 5. (FIGURE 5 OMITTED) This architecture appears to provide a framework for defining with greater precision than

meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- 14080 Douglas Bourdon I [None] Use of internet to entice m

human cognition. Aaron Sloman's Cognition and Affect project has explored a space of architectures proposed as models for human minds; a sketch of Sloman's H-CogAff model is shown in figure 5. [FIGURE 5 OMITTED) This architecture appears to provide a framework for defining with greater precision than

tstanding charges in the state would put an appropriate end to the matter for everyone. EFTA00226776 r LAW 00 ICC,. Y. GERALD B. LEFCOURT. P.C. Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Matthew Menchel, Esq. Andrew LS. A. Marie , Esq. The Unite!1Mttorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 6,2007 Page 23 Again,

words HEADLINE: The St. Thomas common sense symposium: designing architectures for human-level intelligence. BYLINE: Minsky, Marvin; Singh, Push; Sloman, Aaron BODY: To build a machine that has "common sense" was once a principal goal in the field of artificial intelligence. But most researchers in

meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- 14080 Douglas Bourdon 1 iNonei Use of intemet to entice mi

s a particularly clear embodiment of "modern common sense" regarding the overall architecture of the human mind. We have added only a couple items to Sloman’s high-level diagram, which we felt deserved an explicit high-level role that he did not give them: emotion, language and reinforcement. e The LIDA

e The LIDA architecture diagram presented by Stan Franklin and Bernard Baars [BF 09]. We think LIDA is an excellent model of working memory and what Sloman calls "reactive processes", with well-researched grounding in the psychology and neuroscience literature. We have adapted the LIDA diagram only very

ible movements. Following a metaphor suggested by Douglas Hofstadter [Hof96], MOSES learning covers both “k

The LIDA architecture diagram presented by Stan Franklin and Bernard Ikuirs [13F09J. We think LIDA is an excellent model of working memory and what Sloman calls "reactive processes", with well-researched grounding in the psychology and neuroscience literature. We have adapted the LIDA diagram only ver

a particularly clear embodiment of "modern common sense" regarding the overall architecture of the human mind. We have added only a couple items to Sloman's high-level diagram, which we felt deserved an explicit high-level role that he did not give them: emotion, language and reinforcement. • The LIDA

ble movements. Following a metaphor suggested by Douglas Hofstadter MOSES learning covers both "knob twid

words HEADLINE: The St. Thomas common sense symposium: designing architectures for human-level intelligence. BYLINE: Minsky, Marvin; Singh, Push; Sloman, Aaron BODY: To build a machine that has 'common sense" was once a principal goal in the field of artificial intelligence. But most researchers in

human cognition. Aaron Sloman's Cognition and Affect project has explored a space of architectures proposed as models for human minds; a sketch of Sloman's H-CogAff model is shown in figure 5. [FIGURE 5 OMITTED] This architecture appears to provide a framework for defining with greater precision than

meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- 14080 Douglas Bourdon 1 [None] Use of intemet to entice mi

was categorically denied by the Southern District’s then first assistant, Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman correctly represented the existence of “significant legal impediments to [federally] prosecuting” what was a quintessentially state case. He also co

federal charges because Mr. Epstein had a “high-priced defense team.” This was categorically denied by the Southern District’s then first assistant, Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman correctly represented the existence of “significant legal impediments to [federally]

ing to Hoffenberg, the two men were introduced by Douglas Leese, a defense contractor. Epstein has said the

proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them was a victim of an enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman used similar language in tying the names of the "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see December 6, 2007 letter from Mr. Sloman to M

frey Sloman used similar language in tying the names of the "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see December 6, 2007 letter from Mr. Sloman to Mr. Lefkowitz at 2, 3; see also your email to Mr. Lefkowitz and Mr. Black on August 14, 2008 at 3:27 p.m., where you state that the list contains

Fax: 561 697 2383 Counsel for Plaintiffiane Doe Douglas M. McIntosh, Esq. Jason A. McGrath, Esq. McInto

/2007 EFTA00188433 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida NEWS BRIEFING To: R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant James Swain, Executive Assistant Alicia O. Valle, Special Counsel Robert Senior, Chief, Criminal Division Kenneth Noto, Deputy C

ng to Hoffenberg, the two men were introduced by Douglas Leese, a defense contractor. Epstein has said the

iew it. There are no pages. Yours may 21 have pages; mine don't have pages. 22 BY MR. EDWARDS: 23 Q. In the top right, it starts "Jeffrey 24 Sloman," if you go down to that -- 25 A. Would you find it for me. www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615735 615 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Q. Sure. MR. SCOTT:

dvantage ... distribution (1) 553:24,25 475:14 476:1 589:10 609:20618:3 646:11 554:4,12,14 476:12,20 desire (1) disagree (1) document (36) Douglas (1) 480:19.20 www.phi sr orting.com EFTA00615776 9 481:6,17 537:11 538:5 608:17,23 encounters (1) Epstein (135) 483:15,23 539:1,7,14,22

No, sir. 8 Q. How many women and how many men came to 9 your house? 10 A. I want to say two ladies and two guys. 11 Q. Did someone named Jeffrey Sloman come to 12 your house? 13 A. I don't know names, sir. 14 Q. Do you know who Jeffrey Sloman is? 15 A. No, sir. 16 Q. Do you know who Jef

ax: 561 697 2383 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Douglas M. McIntosh, Esq. Jason A. McGrath, Esq. McInto