Epstein Secrets

was categorically denied by the Southern District’s then first assistant, Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman correctly represented the existence of “significant legal impediments to [federally] prosecuting” what was a quintessentially state case. He also co

federal charges because Mr. Epstein had a “high-priced defense team.” This was categorically denied by the Southern District’s then first assistant, Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman correctly represented the existence of “significant legal impediments to [federally]

ot claim that Ms. Roberts lawyers had told him that they did not believe her. 77. Instead, the morning of December 9, 2015, Mr. Dershowitz pleaded: “David, Have we given up on a mutually acceptable statement from VR or you. Let’s keep trying. We are not that far apart.” (Exhibit 15). When Ms. Roberts la

that by bringing this case ... which we ultimately settled very successfully for her,” said McCawley, an associate of noted Bush-Gore recount lawyer David Boies, who has also pursued cases against Epstein in federal court in New York. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article2 19494920 html 4/3/2019 HOU

cerning my knowledge of the events described herein. 4, In or about May 2015, I received a call from Mr. Dershowitz who told me that a client of Mr. Boies’ law firm was accusing Mr. Dershowitz of having had sexual relations with her when she was under the age of consent. Mr. Dershowitz said he had been

gainst me during the negotiations. Q. Is this part of your work product that you're waiving right now? MR. SWEDER: No, no. A. My conversation with Jeffrey Sloman is not work product. MR. SCOTT: Here's a -- BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. What is the work product -- MR. SCOTT: Excuse me. Please review wo MwA HM B@ WHY

lso containing discussion of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit). The Court should be aware that within approximately two hours of this exchange, Ms. McCawley. (David Boies’ law partner) released a statement on his behalf, which stated that Dershowitz was misrepresenting what happened: “Because the discussions that Mr. Bo

s’ law partner) released a statement on his behalf, which stated that Dershowitz was misrepresenting what happened: “Because the discussions that Mr. Boies had with Mr. Dershowitz were expressly privileged settlement discussions, Mr. Boies will not, at least at this time, describe what was actually sai

s to -~- to conceal the scope of -- of the -- of the operation. In addition to that, when I started to compare the Dave Rogers' flight logs with the David -- excuse me. I am going to get a drink. When I started to compare the -- oh, I'm sorry. I should be looking at the camera. When I started -- when

ERS, P.C. EFTA00079770 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 head of the first assistant, Mr. Sloman. THE COURT: In New York. MR. WEINBERG: Right. In the Southern district, there were six or seven prosecutors, including New York City prosecutors,

r Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079746 1 2 3 J7FYEPSC APPEARANCES ( Also Present: David Boies Brad Edwards , NYPD 4 , FBI 5 6 U.S. Pretrial Services n} 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DIST

rd? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079811 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Mr. Boies? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Hold on one second. Mr. Boles, just wait until we finish with them. I take it that the answer is yes? MR

ERS, P.C. EFTA00095412 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 head of the first assistant, Mr. Sloman. THE COURT: In New York. MR. WEINBERG: Right. In the Southern district, there were six or seven prosecutors, including New York City prosecutors,

dant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00095388 1 2 3 J7FYEPSC APPEARANCES (Cont'd) Also Present: David Boies Brad Edwards NYPD 4 , FBI 5 6 U.S. Pretrial Services n} 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRI

rd? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00095453 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Mr. Boies? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Hold on one second. Mr. Boles, just wait until we finish with them. I take it that the answer is yes? MR

orized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #2 P-008517 Thru P-008535 6/25/2007 Letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman and Andrew Lourie [pursuant to Court's Order, not being withheld as privileged — will be produced to opposing counsel upon lift of stay by I Ith

onship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?)" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from J. Sloman Attorney-Client Privilege Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings

s Petition; CVRA-authorized analysis charts, victim/witness who are not parties to this release; Material Severable; Redaction; No photographs, DAVID records, NCICs, and related materials for persons identified as litigation Assertion by Victims Jane Does #15, 16, 17, 18, 19, Past Em lo ees, M

. Yes. 12:19:22 23 A. No, but I do know that she never told the 12:19:23 24 FBI anything about me whatsoever. Because I was 25 told that by Jeffrey Sloman, who was the assistant EFTA00601266 114 1 United States attorney in charge of this case. 2 Jeffrey Sloman said he was prepared to file a sworn

no criminal complaints against anyone, 18 correct? 19 A. To answer that question requires me to 12:12:40 20 disclose conversations I had with David Boies. I 21 would love to answer that question. 22 Q. No, sir, it does not. 12:12:48 23 A. Yes, it does. 12:12:49 24 MR. SCOTT: Whoa, you can't

his wife, once on an air -- once on 16 Jeffrey Epstein's airplane and once on the island. 17 And it is completely clear, and David 12:39:21 18 Boies was the lawyer for -- for Al Gore, as was 19 as was I, we worked together on that case, that a 20 simple phone call from -- from David Boies to

e Also contains documents subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation Box #3 P-013227 April 23, 2008 Memo from Jeffrey Sloman to Office of Professional Responsibility re Self Reporting, Corrected Version of the previously submitted April 21, 2008 Letter to OPR Privacy Ac

ter with attorney handwritten notes Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru P-013337 File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from responding to J. Lefkowitz's letter Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product

ile, attorney typed notes, relevant pieces of grand jury materials, telephone records/flight records analysis charts, victim/witness photographs, DAVID records, NCICs, and related materials for persons identified as Jane Does #9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Also con

orized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #2 P-008517 Thru P-008535 6/25/2007 Letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman and Andrew Lourie [pursuant to Court's Order, not being withheld as privileged — will be produced to opposing counsel upon lift of stay by 11th C

onship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Leflcowitz (was this sent?)" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from J. Sloman Attorney-Client Privilege Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinning

m's Petition; CVRA-authorized analysis charts, victim/witness who are not parties to this release; Material Severable; Redaction; No photographs, DAVID records, NCICs, and related materials for persons identified as litigation Assertion by Victims Jane Does #15, 16, 17, 18, 19, Past Employees, M

isher Nlilecember 11, 2007 letter, Lefkowitz to Acosta Attorney General Guidelines (2005), Victim and Witness Assistance November 27, 2007 email, Sloman to Lefkowitz • December 26, 2007 letter, Lefkowitz to Acosta Complaint, E.W. v. Epstein (CW) Complaint, L.M. I. Epstein (TM) S/A Kuyrkendall Decl

ile, attorney typed notes, relevant pieces of grand jury materials, telephone records/flight records analysis charts, victim/witness photographs, DAVID records, NCICs, and related materials for persons identified as Jane Does #15, 16, 17, 18, 19, Past Employees, Misc. Witnesses Work product 6(e)