Epstein Secrets

your letter, you enclosed a communication from Mr. Stamen to Judge Davis dated October 25, 2007 and an additional document, presumably aiso from Mr. Sloman, entitled: "PROPOSAL FOR PROCEEDING ONCE ATTORNEY 1S SELECTED." While you refer to these documents as your "marching orders," neither document is p

rsuant tot he NPA and its Addendum ceases only in the event that the Any Rep files contested litigation against Epstein on behalf of a victim. The Recent Settlement During the last six months there have been meetings, emails and phone conversations between Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz and Bob Josefsberg that corrob

nd it is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement. The agreement speaks for itself. Enclosed is a copy of the marching orders I received from Mr. Sloman. Pursuant to these directions and the ethical requirements of the legal profession to zealously represent my clients, I have attempted to efficientl

suant tot he NPA and its Addendum ceases only in the event that the Atty Rep files contested litigation against Epstein on behalf of a victim. The Recent Settlement During the last six months there have been meetings, emails and phone conversations between Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz and Bob Josefsberg that corrob

nd it is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement. The agreement speaks for itself. Enclosed is a copy of the marching orders I received from Mr. Sloman. Pursuant to these directions and the ethical requirements of the legal profession to zealously represent my clients, I have attempted to efficientl

suant tot he NPA and its Addendum ceases only in the event that the Atty Rep files contested litigation against Epstein on behalf of a victim. The Recent Settlement During the last six months there have been meetings, emails and phone conversations between Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz and Bob Josefsberg that corrob