Epstein Secrets

your letter, you enclosed a communication from Mr. Stamen to Judge Davis dated October 25, 2007 and an additional document, presumably aiso from Mr. Sloman, entitled: "PROPOSAL FOR PROCEEDING ONCE ATTORNEY 1S SELECTED." While you refer to these documents as your "marching orders," neither document is p

at all fee disagreements should be resolved by a special master. We are not averse to that. I am sure that I need not remind you that with regard to the Atty Rep's work thus far, there has been complete performance on ow side and partial performance by the Defendant. Epstein did make partial payment of our ini

nd it is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement. The agreement speaks for itself. Enclosed is a copy of the marching orders I received from Mr. Sloman. Pursuant to these directions and the ethical requirements of the legal profession to zealously represent my clients, I have attempted to efficientl

re engaged in the settlement process. This is particularly apt when Epstein chose to avail himself of this settlement opportunity so as to preclude the Atty Rep's filing of a lawsuit on behalf of the victim. Epstein's obligation to pay the Atty Rep's fees and costs pursuant tot he NPA and its Addendum ceases

nd it is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement. The agreement speaks for itself. Enclosed is a copy of the marching orders I received from Mr. Sloman. Pursuant to these directions and the ethical requirements of the legal profession to zealously represent my clients, I have attempted to efficientl

re engaged in the settlement process. This is particularly apt when Epstein chose to avail himself of this settlement opportunity so as to preclude the Atty Rep's filing of a lawsuit on behalf of the victim. Epstein's obligation to pay the Atty Rep's fees and costs pursuant tot he NPA and its Addendum ceases