Epstein Secrets

y Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and express consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

aive liability and not contest jurisdiction only-when certain well defined conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was EFTA00729061 silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to

r. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00729137 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington D.C., a review process tha

Mr. Epstein waive liability and not contest jurisdiction only when certain conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to whether certain

y Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and express consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

aive liability and not contest jurisdiction only-when certain well defined conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was EFTA00729142 silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to

r. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00614563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington IU, a review process that

bility and not contest jurisdiction only when certain expressly delineated conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to whether certain