Epstein Secrets

-Justiee-Deparnnent-emitast-any-vistimsr including fer-example-Jane-Dee44-r abeut-their-views-en4he-nen-preseeutiem 26. On about December 6, 2007, Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney sent a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit neting-the ttemeyie EpsteM-Ple-lette

ation would continue, possibly leading to a federal prosecution. Edwards Declaration at ¶ 8. a On about November 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeff Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Epstein, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit The e-mail-statedt—that-the-1478,Atiem

overnment reached any final mseimien-ef-that-investigatienr Edwards-Deelaratien-at--11-147 33. On about February 25, 2008, Assistant U.S. Attorney Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Leflcowitz„ a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit _.Bpsteinls—eriminal—defense eeunselr explaining that the Justice D

Fairy Jaffe NtIssIng Farmer Jaffe Weissing 29$ Ito • 44 talong sedan Ito • 9 were heft law haft('

al Agents or I had ever discussed lawsuits or even restitution with any victim during any of their interviews and that First Assistant U.S. Attorney Sloman had never met any of the victims, this was exactly the type of cross-examination that I anticipated Epstein's attorneys would try at a trial. The O

hat is? A: No, sir. TIEN: How many women and how many men came to your house? A: I want to say two ladies and two guys. TIEN: Did someone named Jeffrey Sloman come to your house? A: I don't know names, sir. 'HEN: Do you know who Jeffrey Sloman is? A: No, sir. * * * TIEN: And you say you don't know wh

3.401-5007 Dear Jim; 500 South Attain/too Ave, &Ito 400 act Pa& :Beach, FL 334W (50)1120-871 Amnio

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

of a trial. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney You also accuse me of "broaden[ing] the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding cha

d Alit° Didn't you say that/ h. Ilea to ay tages1•494 or reoelleetion. t have never said astride; Ilia that. O. That would have bum a eemplote Ito, wouldn't it have Wesel F,,. In= — — 1656 NM Oath Me had, sae - West Palm OsC3JUH11--.- tOnsor & Associates Pagel 74 Corneal. I do at know h

d as a sex offender and objected to any sentence short of incarceration. The Assistant State Attorney in charge of the sex-crimes unit reported Mr. Sloman's conduct during the proceedings as "outrageous." The defendant's attorney described Mr. being "out of control." Shortly after, Mr. began publicl

the Police Report tat 85). Detective "explained Ito ASA Itclohlavek) that the PBPD had concluded its

n has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. Sloman mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems l

arguments. Jeff Sloman has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to

n has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. Sloman mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations arc (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems l

arguments. Jeff Sloman has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to

n has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. Sloman mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there 50 EFTA00190427 are any) for the vari

arguments. Jeff Sloman has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

the Police Report (at $5). Detective "explained Ito MA Belohlavek) that the PBPD had concluded its ea

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Ito: Isfftty_frengeb Dear Jay: 99 ME. 4. Street M