Epstein Secrets

of the Agreement requires an unusual and unprecedented threatened application of federal law." I. The Alleged "Leak" to the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (NO). While the District's PIO was on annual

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended arc in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines--u status rtmuiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the delimdant—it was and remains our position that these women may he notified of su

ions, but also sharing with him details about your Office's theory concerning what laws you believe Mr. Epstein has violated. In broad strokes, Mr. David Weinstein told Mr. Thomas that the Office was contemplating charging Mr. Epstein under Sections 2422(b) (with a full discussion of principal liability), 2423,

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters are intended are in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—a status requiring physical, emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc

9, ZOOS Page 7 Government's confidential "list or victims." Most of these lawsuits seek S50 million in money darnages.4 a Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein spoke about the case in great detail to Landon Thomas, a reporter with the Mew York Times, and revealed confidential information about the Governme

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended are in fact not victims us defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—u status requiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc