Epstein Secrets

rms and conditions of the Agreement, as modified by the USA's December 19th letter to Ms. Sanchez. 08-80736-Ce-MARRA P-014949 EFTA00224736 AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (PIO). While the District's PIO was on annua

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(Me will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardin

urther investigation B-11- 2/29/2008 Acosta Lefkowitz Email - 1 page 2/29/2008 Emails between Jeff Sloman, Marie Villafatia, Robert Senior, and David Weinstein regarding continuing investigation and status of CEOS review B-1 18 3/1/2008 FBI Reports of March 2008 interviews of additional witness/victim loc

Andrew Lourie Marie Villafana Email regarding proposed changes to indictment 36/64 / /6 /007 Meeting where Criminal Chief Menchel announces that USA Acosta will offer a two-year state plea. Present: Matt Menchel, Marie Villafana, Andy Lourie (phone), Valerie Parlave, Junior Ortiz, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall,

one week to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, as modified by the USA's December I 9th letter to Ms. Sanchez. 8 EFTA00190445 AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (PIO). While the District's PIO was on annua

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(Me will defer to the discretion of the State Anorney regarding

s of the Agreement requires an unusual and unprecedented threatened application of federal law." 1. The Alleged teak' to the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (PIO). While the District's PIO was on annua

no less." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "bode will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardi

of the Agreement requires an unusual and unprecedented threatened application of federal law." 1. The Alleged "Leak" to the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (PIO). While the District's PIO was on annua

A00225184 Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "[wie will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regard

enns and conditions of the Agreement, as modified by the USA's December 10 letter to Ms. Sanchez. 08-80736-C8V-MARRA P-014949 EFTA00225336 AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (PIO). While the District's PIO was on annua

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SOFLis intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: Il(w)e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regard

s of the Agreement requires an unusual and unprecedented threatened application of federal law." 1. The Alleged "Leak'to the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (PIO). While the District's PIO was on annua

no less." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DRAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(w)e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardi

19, 2008 Page 7 Government's confidential "list of victims." Most of these lawsuits seek S50 million in money damages" • Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein spoke about the case in great detail to Landon Thomas, a reporter with the New York nines, and revealed confidential information about she Governme

the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the federal resolution as required by law; however, "rwle will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding w

of the Agreement requires an unusual and unprecedented threatened application of federal law." I. The Alleged "Leak" to the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (NO). While the District's PIO was on annual

the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the federal resolution as required by law; however, "[wje will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding w