Epstein Secrets

BYNUM,T EDWARD KLEIN,GEORGE EVANS,LESLIE R SUNTRUST BANK TR RUTH R DOBBS

ELSON,EDWARD HEATHWOOD,DESMOND J BEYER,LAWRENCE WYCKKOFF,SHELBY PUCILLO,DE

matter at hand."). We do not then reverse anytime we disagree with the result that the district court reaches. See First Penn-Pac. Life Ins. Co. v. Evans, 304 F.3d 345, 348 (4th Cir. 2002). Rather, "the [abuse-of-discretion] standard draws a line . . . between the unsupportable and the merely mistake

224, 1238 (10th Cir. 2004), so much so that Ihrighly fact-based, complex, difficult matters" arise as a matter of routine, Amchem, 521 U.S. at 630 (Breyer, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Unsurprisingly, then, we give district courts "broad discretion in deciding whether to allow the ma

se motive is often the critical issue, "summary judgment disposition re- mains appropriate if the (non-movantl can- not prevail as a matter of law." Evans v. Technologies Applications & Serv. Co., 80 F2d 954, 958-59 (4th Cir.1996); Ennis v. Nat Asa of Bus. and Edna Redick Inc., 53 F.3d, 55, 62 (4th

nst Sexual Exploitation Act and the White Slave Traffic Act. The offender moved to dismiss all actions against him. Holdings: The District Court, Breyer, J., held that: (1) in a matter of first impression, the doctrine of forum non conveniens applied, and (2) the action would be dismissed without p