Epstein Secrets

statements, their credibility and the foundations. il' any. for claiming personal istiory. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in the Ponta of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avai

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended are in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—I swum requiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the deli ndant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of such

r statements, their credibility and the foundations. if any. for claiming personal injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in the lbrm of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended arc in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—a status requiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may he notified of suc

statements. their, credibility and the foundations. if any. fir claiming personal injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in tlx: form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avai

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended are in fact not victims us defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—u status requiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc

ir statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming person! injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the tbnn of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended arc in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines--u status rtmuiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the delimdant—it was and remains our position that these women may he notified of su

r statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters are intended are in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—a status requiring physical, emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc

r statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters are intended are in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—a status requiring physical, emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc