Epstein Secrets

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would

ousands of pages of documents it has produced.' As a fourth and final illustration, the victims requested information about why the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) was "conflicted out" of considering issues relating to the Epstein matter, as well as any information that developed about that conflic

as a few mouse clicks to find a gun for sale from a private seller on an online marketplace or through social media." Gun violence prevention group Brady says that as a result, "about one in five gun buys is conducted with no background check" Some In Greenville See Connection Between Trump Rally And

to justice, the Department of Justice should rip up the non-prosecution, non-investigation agreement entered into by Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in 2008; he continued." FBI Seized Computers In Raid Of Epstein's Virgin Island Home. CNBC (8/13, Mangan, Breuninger, 3.62M) reports, "FBI agents

ed to provide the draft indictmatt. We understand that we have no statutory right to a FRI 302 that inculpates Mr. Epstein (although we believe that Brady principles would encourage the disclosure of P131 302 reports that exonerate him). We are Lammed that there is information that could be rebutted i

s 02139 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Dcrshowitz: You have asked me to review the procedures and methods employed by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in injecting itself into the State of Florida investigation and prosecution of your client, Jeffrey Epstein. In short, and as will be set forth at

reasonableness."); / Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 432-33, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1565, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995) (under the Due Process Clause and 11 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), prosecutors must disclose all evidence, upon request, that is favorable to the def

pstein's conduct. After developing substantial incriminating evidence, the FBI referred the matter for prosecution to the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Beginning in January 2007, and over the course of the ensuing eight *1199 months, Epstein's defense team engaged in extensive negotiations with f

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would

rights under the CVRA. 79. In October 2007, shortly after the initial non-prosecution agreement was signed between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, Jane Doe No. I was contacted to be advised regarding the investigation. On October 26, 2007, Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richa

npersuaded by the letter and the presentation, but I agreed that I should carefully review transcripts of the recorded statements given to PBPD for Brady issues." Since witness credibility was clearly at the fore, I undertook efforts " The requested documents and items were never provided. 15 As the

continued secrecy; and (5) the request is structured to cover only the needed materials. EFTA00225479 Accordingly, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, including Assistant United States Attorney A. Marie Villafafia, and the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility may disclose to