Epstein Secrets

statements, their credibility and the foundations. il' any. for claiming personal istiory. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in the Ponta of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avai

ds from the Trust will be available to he disbursed at the buster's discretitm to an agreed list of persons who se •k reimbursement and make' gutid Milli showing to the 'immix: that they suffered Injury as I result or the conduct or Epstein. Epstein waives his right m contest liability or damages up t

er exceeded the scope of the warrant or diverged from the warrant's permissible search strategy; raise allegations that the government violated its Brady obligations; challenge an expert's credentials or methodology; or generally sow doubt and confusion. Forensics audit trails can be quite lengthy, an

one.net/StarFagiotligtag3itgamatitmt&null&nTotallte.. 8/15N8g9 I 6 EFTA00228296 cr, •=ko <=2:, co tmt&null&nTotalltc 1 'VII !Pin 1111 1111i16 Milli a 11,111{ l'„ hill HI i N11111%14 I halm 11411 .,41 p hi Illini loileithillifilail !Pig hilaiiill tyillhi I itiAlt iiq it 410 ph., ; i il .1'

r statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

iolation by Mr. Epstein of § 2422(b) or 'hi ther federal statute—a denial of his rights that would insulate potential claimants such as Ms. and Ms. Milli from any challenge on this element even if under other circumstances a challenge would result in a summary judgment in Mr. Epstein's favor under Fe

r statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

olation by Mr. Epstein of § 2422(b) or any other federal statute—a denial of his rights that would insulate potential claimants such as Ms. ad Ms. Milli from any challenge on this element even if under other circumstances a challenge would result in a summary judgment in Mr. Epstein's favor under Fe