Epstein Secrets

NY 10022 ♦1 212 957 7600 phono www colsmipossoo corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following request

rors, witnesses under examination, court reporters, and attorneys from the United States Department of Justice. Consistent with the requirements of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 438 (1995), as well as your own professional obligations, we request that the g

at we may file any necessary motions with the Court. Thank you in advance for your attention to these matters. Sincerely, Is/ Christian Everdell Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor New York New York 10022 cc: Mark S. Cohen, Esq. Jeff Pagliuca, Esq. Laura Menninger, Esq. Bo

GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 20 Cr. 330 (MN) REPLY N1EMOR kNDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.

was legally obligated to do so. shows that the government has accept e accusers accounts without serious scrutiny. Given the ovenunent's ongoittti Brady obligations. it is unsettling that the government would simply acce Contrary to the government's assertion_ the defense has not abandoned our legal

ntifying these witnesses and their prior statements are exculpatory evidence, which must be disclosed pursuant to the government's obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny.' Second, the Court should order the government to disclose the Materials under Rule 16 because th

the government to immediately produce the Materials and the prior statements of these witnesses to the defense. Sincerely, Is/ Christian Everdell Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor New York, New York 10022 EFTA00023333 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 64 F

GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00028929 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table

l filed her Motion, she did not have access to the government's emails and AUSA contemporaneous notes, despite their obvious exculpatory value. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87-88 (1963). The government did not disclose these materials until Maxwell challenged the government's candor and conduc

UNTS ONE THROUGH SIX OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR PRE-INDICTMENT DELAY Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00028963 --- PAGE BREAK --- The si

s produced all of the discovery in this matter, including, but not limited to any alleged F.R.E. 404(b) information, all witness statements, and all Brady and Giglio material. Dated: March 15, 2021 2 EFTA00028965 --- PAGE BREAK --- Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Jeffrey S. Pagli

GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00029100 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Contents Table of Contents F

ses Abdell v. City of New York, No. 05 CIV. 8453 KMK JCF, 2006 WL 2664313 (.=. Sept 14, 2006) 8 Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935) 24 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) 11 Brown v. Marcel, 929 F.3d 4 (2d Cir. 2019) 19, 20 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 19