Epstein Secrets

en the Department of Justice and Mr. Epstein (the "NPA"). Each is subject to disclosure pursuant to the government's obligations under, inter alia. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Mr. Epstein seeks all documents, communications, and/or tangible objec

activities alleged in the Indictment or related transactions, including but not limited to the Department of Justice (including but not limited to the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, other offices of "Main Justice," the Federal Bureau of Investigation and all United States Attorney's Offices), the Securities and Exchange Commis

en the Department of Justice and Mr. Epstein (the "NPA"). Each is subject to disclosure pursuant to the government's obligations under, inter alia, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Mr. Epstein seeks all documents, communications, and/or tangible objec

activities alleged in the Indictment or related transactions, including but not limited to the Department of Justice (including but not limited to the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, other offices of "Main Justice," the Federal Bureau of Investigation and all United States Attorney's Offices), the Securities and Exchange Commis

reasonableness."); / Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 432-33, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1565, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995) (under the Due Process Clause and 11 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), prosecutors must disclose all evidence, upon request, that is favorable to the def

torney R. Alexander Acosta met with some of Epstein's defense team, along with the federal prosecutors assigned to Epstein's case and the Chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Department of Justice's Criminal Division in Washington, D.C. Epstein's defense team again raised federalism-based arguments that were reje

en the Department of Justice and Mr. Epstein (the "NPA"). Each is subject to disclosure pursuant to the government's obligations under, inter alia. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Mr. Epstein seeks all documents, communications, and/or tangible objec

activities alleged in the Indictment or related transactions, including but not limited to the Department of Justice (including but not limited to the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, other offices of "Main Justice," the Federal Bureau of Investigation and all United States Attorney's Offices), the Securities and Exchange Commis

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would

, the Office of the Attorney General, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Divisions, the Office of Professional Responsibility, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Southern District and Middle District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) and other federal g

ir statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming person! injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the tbnn of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

Matthew MencheP, First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey H. Sloman, United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta as well as various members of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) at the Department of Justice including, but not limited to its Chief, . Many of these legal and factual issues have been discussed and