Epstein Secrets

the victims and permit inspection and copying of all information and material known to the government which may be "favorable" to the victims, see Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (discussing evidence "favorable" to defendants); United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976) (same), on issue of poss

03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. The parties shall make to each other the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)( I )(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 EFTA00208474

the victims and permit inspection and copying of all information and material known to the government which may be "favorable" to the victims, see Brady' Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (discussing evidence "favorable" to defendants); United States'. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976) (same), on issue of possibl

03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. The parties shall make to each other the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)( I )(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 EFTA00212474

the victims and permit inspection and copying of all information and material known to the government which may be "favorable" to the victims, see Brady' Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (discussing evidence "favorable" to defendants); United States'. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976) (same), on issue of possibl

03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. The parties shall make to each other the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)( I )(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 EFTA00235222

method for obtaining these materials; they should instead be disclosed by the Government in accordance with its obligations under 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). See Nixon, 418 U.S. at 699 (requiring party seeking documents pu

e previously used to obtain subpoenas in this case. As Defendants noted in their opposition papers, Defendants previously acted at the direction of Chambers to have subpoenas signed by the Clerk of Court. (Dcfs.' Glenwood Opp'n at 20.) In the future, however, the parties shall provide subpoena requests t

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would

cket 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. The parties shall make to each other the disclosures requited under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(eXI)(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 EFTA00230163 Case 9:

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would p

cket 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. The parties shall make to each other the disclosures requited under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(aXI)(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000

ates v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 109 (2d Cir. 2017) (quoting Nixon, 418 U.S. at 699-700), abrogated on other grounds as recognized by United States v. Chambers, 751 F. App'x 44, 46 & n.1 (2d Cir. 2018) (summary order). It is not sufficient for a party to show only that the subpoenaed documents "are potenti

se was examining his diary, . . . he requested that this not be done." Id. While the parties were discussing how to review the diary, including for Brady material, the diary was returned to the witness. It was only given to the defense for examination after "roughly five days" in the witness's possess