6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
of § 2255 supplies the governing law. -9- EFTA00212901 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 10 of 36 2. The Ex Post Facto Clause Bars Application Of Masha's Law. Even if Congress did intend Masha's Law to apply retroactively, doing so would violate the Ex Post Facto clause. U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 9, cl. 3. A
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
of § 2255 supplies the governing law. -9- EFTA00212968 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 10 of 36 2. The Ex Post Facto Clause Bars Application Of Masha's Law. Even if Congress did intend Masha's Law to apply retroactively, doing so would violate the Ex Post Facto clause. U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 9, cl. 3. A
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
of § 2255 supplies the governing law. -9- EFTA00221371 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 10 of 36 2. The Ex Post Facto Clause Bars Application Of Masha's Law. Even if Congress did intend Masha's Law to apply retroactively, doing so would violate the Ex Post Facto clause. U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 9, cl. 3. A
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
of § 2255 supplies the governing law. -9- EFTA00221468 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 10 of 36 2. The Ex Post Facto Clause Bars Application Of Masha's Law. Even if Congress did intend Masha's Law to apply retroactively, doing so would violate the Ex Post Facto clause. U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 9, cl. 3. A
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
of § 2255 supplies the governing law. -9- EFTA00189757 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 10 of 36 2. The Ex Post Facto Clause Bars Application Of Masha's Law. Even if Congress did intend Masha's Law to apply retroactively, doing so would violate the Ex Post Facto clause. U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 9, cl. 3. A
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone'. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be
-9- Case No. 08.80736-CV-MARRA P-011850 EFTA00192896 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 10 of 36 2. The Ex Post Facto Clause Bars Application Of Masha's Law. Even if Congress did intend Masha's Law to apply retroactively, doing so would violate the Ex Post Facto clause. U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 9, cl. 3. A
Entities connected to both Oliver Stone and The Ex Post Facto Clause Bars Application Of Masha's Law

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON
John Kerry
PERSON
Chuck Grassley
PERSON
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
Schumer
PERSONEvans
PERSON
H.R.
PERSON
Green
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON