Epstein Secrets

eples, Earl & Blauk, P.A., Miami, for appellee. Barry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. L

in's burden had not been met. Epstein's petition asserts that closure is necessary to protect a compelling government interest because, he claims, the U.S. Attorneys' Office — who has been notified of these proceedings and has taken no position whatsoever — has a compelling interest in having the confidentiality provisi

igating Epstein, only to see then-State Attorney Barry Krischer kick the case to a grand jury Mr. Kris

in's burden had not been met. Epstein's petition asserts that closure is necessary to protect a compelling government interest because, he claims, the U.S. Attorneys' Office — who has been notified of these proceedings and has taken no position whatsoever — has a compelling interest in having the confidentiality provisi

igating Epstein, only to see then-State Attorney Barry Krischer kick the case to a grand jury. Mr. Kri

in's burden had not been met. Epstein's petition asserts that closure is necessary to protect a compelling government interest because, he claims, the U.S. Attorneys' Office — who has been notified of these proceedings and has taken no position whatsoever — has a compelling interest in having the confidentiality provisi