Epstein Secrets

L.Ed.2d 405 (1976) (further explaining that alteration of a legal right, in addition to stigma, was at issue in Constantineau ); see also Mosrie v. Barry, 718 F.2d 1151, 1159 (D.C.Cir.1983) 0,4 Paul v. Davis held that reputation alone is neither a liberty interest arising from the Constitution itself

ng the government from disclosing their names in the plea agreement, and requested temporary stay of any adverse decision pending appeal. Holdings: The District Court, John D. Bates, J., held that: (1) disclosure of employees names did not violate rule prohibiting disclosure of a matter occurring before the grand

025606-2006 --Business & Management Consulting-- BARRY FINANCIAL SERVICES INC St. Thomas License #: 1-

31, 1998. Federal government, as landlord, brought proceeding to evict tenants from building. Government moved for partial sum- mary judgment. The District Court, Chin, J., held that: (1) lease unambiguously provided that written consent to sublease was re- quired, precluding claim that government orally co

Christian TARRANT, Jon Lance Jordan, Christopher Barry Greer, Michael Lewis Lawrence, Daniel Alvis Wood

No. 3-89-293-H. Jan. 16, 1990. Defendant who allegedly breached nonprosecu- lion agreement moved to dismiss indictment or to suppress statements. The District Court, Sanders, Chief Judge, held that: (I) defendant, who refused to cooperate by failing to meet with Government representatives, failing to testify b

0131 EFTA00227511 ZE1OOVIDIVIAI-A3-9£L08-80 v BARRY E. KRISCHER STATE ATTORNEY Fifteenth Judicial C

tate grand jury records as part of investigation into whether police officers violated federal criminal civil rights statute when making arrests. The District Court, Arcara, J.. held that federal grand jury was entitled to transcripts and tapes of state grand jury testimony of uncooperating police office