Epstein Secrets

letter from Villafatia 3/4/2010 Roy Black and Martin Weinberg Critton Letter on thoughts and issues concernin

il containing Acosta edits to Agreement 9/24/2007 Villafalia Lefkowitz Email - 1 page with nine page NPA (3 signature pages) attached 9/24/2007 Weinberg, Lourie, Garcia Villafana Email containing Acosta's final edits and asking to discuss potential victim representative 9/24/2007 Acosta, Sloman,

o Larry Visoski (pilot)(retum date 12/1/06) 11/13/2006 Subpoena to Janusz Banasiak (property manager)(return date 12/1/06) 11/13/2006 Subpoena to Adriana Mucinska (former assistant) (return date 12/1/06) 15 11/15/2006 A. Marie Villafafia Lilly Ann Sanchez Gerald Lefcourt from New York and Lilly Ann Sanch

8-2006 E-mail: [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1

rnspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 (305) 371-6421 Fax: (305)358-2006 E-mail: [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Office: (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 Email: owlmgw@attnet Jay P. Let

aration binder containing meta- analysis charts of telephone/flight/grand jury information for a number of victim/witnesses, Nadia Marcinkova, and Adriana Mucinska Work product 6(e) Contains information and documents subject to investigative privilege. Also contains information and documents subject to pr

m (305) 37106421 Jay P. Leflcowitz Kirkland & Ellis, LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Email: [email protected] (212) 446-4970 Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Email: [email protected] (617) 338-9538 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley

[email protected] (212) 446-4970 Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 0211

igation; Improper P-003545 a number of victim/witnesses, Nadia documents subject to Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Marcinkova, and Adriana Mucinska investigative privilege. Public Prosecutor, Attorney Conduct at Issue; Also contains information and documents subject to privacy rights of vict

Agreement, Mr. Epstein's defense team included Ken Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, Lilly Ann Sanchez, Alan Dershowitz, Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, Guy Lewis, Martin Weinberg, Jack Goldberger, Stephanie Thacker", and the associates at Kirkland & Ellis who conducted research on discrete issues. This impressive legal team r

z, Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, Guy Lewis, Martin Weinberg, Jack Goldberger, Stephanie Thacker", and the ass

described in the forfeiture section of this indictment, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH ADRIANA a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and NADIA (a) cannot be located upon the exercisezof due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; (c

letter from Villafatia 3/4/2010 Roy Black and Martin Weinberg Critton Letter on thoughts and issues concernin

il containing Acosta edits to Agreement 9/24/2007 Villafaiia Lefkowitz Email - 1 page with nine page NPA (3 signature pages) attached 9/24/2007 Weinberg, Laurie, Garcia Villafafia Email containing Acosta's final edits and asking to discuss potential victim representative 9/24/2007 Acosta, Sloman

o Larry Visoski (pilot)(return date 12/1/06) 11/13/2006 Subpoena to Janusz Banasiak (property manager)(retum date 12/1/06) 11/13/2006 Subpoena to Adriana Mucinska (former assistant) (return date 12/1/06) 15 I 1/15/2006 A. Marie Villafalia Lilly Ann Sanchez Gerald Lefcourt from New York and Lilly Ann Sanc

n 2002 and 2005. See Flight logs attached hereto as Exhibit “MM.” Clinton traveled on many of those flights with Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Adriana Mucinska, - all employees and/or co-conspirators of Epstein’s that were closely connected to Epstein’s child exploitation and sexual abuse. The documents clea

aim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of Edwards’ pursuit of the claims against him, See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla, 1* Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where “appellant’s lawsuit caused