3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date
claim that is belied by the record? — the hearing court should not have scored Appellant for the majority of allegations which formed the basis of the Level 3 Order. See Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). Accordingly, the Order 6 By previewi
property in Manhattan.2 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date
laimed by the People on the records -- the hearing court should not have scored Appellant for the majority of allegations which formed the basis of the Level 3 Order. See Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). B. The People's Attempt to Introduce
property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date
claim that is belied by the records -- the hearing court should not have scored Appellant for the majority of allegations which formed the basis of the Level 3 Order. See Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). Accordingly, the Order adjudging App
Entities connected to both Martin Weinberg and the Level 3 Order

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Samantha Power
PERSON
New York City
LOCATION
New York State
LOCATION
Ruth Pickholz
PERSONM. Weinberg
PERSONSandra Lynn Musumeci
PERSONAppellant
ORGANIZATIONthe District Attorney's
LOCATIONCriminal Term
ORGANIZATIONTypeface
PERSONFederal Courts
ORGANIZATIONDIGITAL-SUBMISSION COMPLIANCE
ORGANIZATION
Pataki
PERSONFelony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATIONthe Appellate Court
ORGANIZATION