Epstein Secrets

cqueline Perczek, Roy Eric Black, Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, Miami, FL; Jay P. Lefkowitz, PRO HAC VICE, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, New York, NY; Martin G. Weinberg, PRO HAC VICE, Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., Boston, MA. For Martin G. Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, Intervenors: Jacqueline Perczek, Black Srebnick Kornspa

, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, New York, NY; Martin G. Weinberg, PRO HAC VICE, Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., Boston,

ing one case remain protected in a subsequent case[] if they were created by or for a party to the subsequent litigation," Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 248 F.R.D. 663, 668 (N.D. Ga. 2008). These cases rely on the Supreme Court's dicta in Federal Trade Communication v. Grolier, Inc., that "the lite

ngarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (202)-506-3900 Fax: (212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro lac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 (617) 227-3700 Fax: (6

212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro lac vice forthcom

2 (11th Cir. 2011), such as if the claim "'rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all,"' Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. FERC, 140 F.3d 1392, 1404 (11th Cir. 1998) (quoting Texas v. United States, 523U.S. 296, 300 (1998)). Indeed, "[t]he ripeness doctrine is designe

ons proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Ste toe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 15 EFTA00095885 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19

ingarten Ste toe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcom

2 (11th Cir. 2011), such as if the claim "'rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all,"' Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. FERC, 140 F.3d 1392, 1404 (11th Cir. 1998) (quoting Texas v. United States, 523U.S. 296, 300 (1998)). Indeed, "[t]he ripeness doctrine is designe