Epstein Secrets

SQ. Florida Bar No. 126088 [email protected] JACKIE PERCZEK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0042201 [email protected] On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 By: s/Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG,

lack.com On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 0211

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may re

ESQ. Florida Bar No. 126088 [email protected] JACKIE PERCZEK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0042201 [email protected] On behalf of Jefrey Epstein MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. By: s/Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. 519480 [email protected] On behalf of Jay Epstein 17 EFTA0021073

black.com On behalf of Jefrey Epstein MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. By: s/Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEI

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may rest

MEMORANDUM OF LAW Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of

ully submitted, /s/Rov Black Roy Black Jackie Perczek BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF P A. -12- EFTA00605762 Attorneys for Intervenors Is/Martin G. Weinberg Martin G. Weinber Attorney for Intervenors CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HERE CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was filed via CM/ECF, this 2"

out its contents." Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Case No. 3:13-cv-222-J-34JBT (M.D. Fla. March 13, 2014), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41406, at *6, quoting Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 31 (1984) Placing limitations on the dissemination and use of pretrial discovery is particularly important since "[t]he