Epstein Secrets

to speak to me or need any further information, please feel free to contact me. V JAG/slm s, Jack A. Goldberger EFTA00231498 A53 Letter from Martin G. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Se: Offenders Regarding Risk Level and Designation Determination for Jeffrey Epstein, dated August 16, 2010 [pp. A53-A

berger EFTA00231498 A53 Letter from Martin G. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Se: Offenders Regard

TH THE MANDATES OF SORA AND CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS AND MUST BE VACATED. 45 CONCLUSION 49 EFTA00231543 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Doe v. Pataki, 3 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 32, 33, 35, 36 E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 (1998) 34, 35 Fr

to speak to me or need any further information, please feel free to contact me. V JAG/slm s, Jack A. Goldberger EFTA00232618 A53 Letter from Martin G. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders Regarding Risk Level and Designation Determination for Jeffrey Epstein, dated August 16, 2010 [pp. A53-A

berger EFTA00232618 A53 Letter from Martin G. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders Regard

THE MANDATES OF SORA AND CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS AND MUST BE VACATED. 45 CONCLUSION 49 ll EFTA00232663 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Doe v. Pataki, 3 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 32, 33, 35, 36 E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 (1998) 34, 35 Fr

in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).' Appellant does not live in N

r a state registration and notification scheme like SORA have a protected liberty interest that entitles them to procedural due process. See Doe v. Pataki, 3 F. Supp. 2d 456, 468 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); see also People v. David W., 95 N.Y.2d 130, 138 (2000) (holding that the imposition of a Level 3 SORA det

property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

y of N.Y., 61 A.D.2d 187 (2d Dep't 1978) 7 Chautauqua Cnty. Fed'n of Sportsmens Club, Inc. v. Caflisch, 15 A.D.2d 260 (4th Dep't 1962) 5 Doe v. Pataki, 3 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 24 Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V. v. Eastbrook Caribe, 40 3d 415 (1st Dep't 2007) 30 Karasik u. Bird, 104 2

property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

that courts must apply a clear and convincing evidence standard when considering a Board recommendation and making its SORA determination); Doe v. Pataki, 3 F.Supp. 2d 456, 471-72 ( . 1998) (holding federal due process under SORA is only satisfied where each risk factor is supported by clear and conv

in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in Ne

F SORA AND CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS AND MUST BE VACATED. 45 CONCLUSION 49 EFTA00181027 , EFTA00181028 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Doe v. Pataki, 3 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 32, 33, 35, 36 E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 (1998) 34, 35 Fr