Epstein Secrets

14 As Amicas cuicmie: , ESQ. 15 Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 East Broward Boulevard 16 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 For U.S.A. 954.356.7255 17 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. 18 20 Park Plaza Boston MA 02116 19 (Via telephone) 20 JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) 21 REPORTED BY: LARRY HERR, RPR-RMR-FCRR-

3 MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, we have two members of the 14 defense team are on the phone, also. 15 THE COURT: Who do we have on the phone? 16 MR. WEINBERG: Martin Weinberg. Good morning, Your 17 Honor. 18 MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowitz. Good morning, Your 19 Honor. 20 THE COURT: Good morning. 21 I

mmary Judgment" pleadings (which we provided in their entirety to your Office as a courtesy six months ago) on March 18, 2011. Sincerely, s it74, Bradley J. dwards ?c' Paul . Cassell Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Cc: Special Agent in Charge John V. Gillies Miami FBI Field Office 16320

015546 --- PAGE BREAK --- Bradley J. Edwards STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Waa d ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared this day Bradley J. Edwards, who is personally known to me or ([_] _ produced , aS identification, and who, after being duly sworn, did state that he/she executed the fo

5552 --- PAGE BREAK --- Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Filing Supplement COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Martin Weinberg, Esquire [email protected]; Martin Weinberg, P.C. [email protected] 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Suffolk, MA 02

COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Martin Weinberg, Esquire [email protected]; Martin Weinberg,

IAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, / DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT’S M

aim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of Edwards’ pursuit of the claims against him, See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla, 1* Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where “appellant’s lawsuit caused