Epstein Secrets

v. Moynihan, 125 A.D.2d 34, 512 N.Y.S.2d 266 (3d Dep't 1987), aff'd on other grounds, 71 N.Y.2d 263, 525 N.Y.S.2d 24 (1988) 9 In re Herald Co. v. Weisenberg, 59 N.Y.2d 378, 465 N.Y.S.2d 862 (1983) 10 Mancheski v. Gabelli Grp. Capital Partners, 39 A.D.3d 499, 835 N.Y.S.2d 595 (2d Dep't 2007) 10 Maxim

6 N.Y.S.3d 19 (1st Dep't 2015) 10 Danco Labs., Ltd v. Chem. Works of Gideon Richter, Ltd, 274 A.D.2d 1, 711 N.Y.S.2d 419 (1st Dep't 2000) 11, 13 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596 (1982) 11, 13 In re Application of National Broad Co., 635 F.2d 945 (2d Cir. 1980) 11, 13 In re Associated Pres

rict Attomey Of Counsel HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016477 --- PAGE BREAK --- EXHIBIT F HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016478 --- PAGE BREAK --- Browning, Jack _ = From: Martin G. Weinberg <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 8:14 AM To: Browning, Jack; ‘Maksim Nemtsev' Ce: Balin, Robert; [email protected] Subject: RE: Moti

f of Mr Epstein. | appreciate your courtesy in providing me with more time to respond given the holidays. Let me know if this email suffices. Thanks, Marty Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 off - 617 227 3700 fax - 617 338 9538 cell - 617 901 3472 information from the Law Office of Martin

[email protected]>; 'Maksim Nemtsev' <[email protected]> Cc: Balin, Robert <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Motion to Unseal Epstein Appeal Briefs Marty, Please find attached a scan of the signed signature page. Best regards, Jack HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016479 --- PAGE BREAK --- From: Martin G. Weinber

bs., Ltd. v. Chem. Works of Gideon Richter, Ltd., 274 A.D.2d 1, 711 N.Y.S.2d 419 (1st Dep't 2000) oo. eeeeseseeseeseeeeeseeeteeseeeseeseeeees 13, 15 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596 (1982)... eeeceesescesseseeseeseeseescscesceseescesceesseeseecseeseseeseeseeaeaseeaeeacseeseesseateaseeeases 13, 14

aim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of Edwards’ pursuit of the claims against him, See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla, 1* Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where “appellant’s lawsuit caused

plead a claim for punitive damages, the claimant must show a “reasonable basis” for the recovery of such damages. See Fla.R.Civ-P. 1.190(f); see also Globe Newspaper Co. v. King, 658 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla. 1995). The showing required to amend is minimal. As stated in State of Wis. Inv. v. Plantation Square Assoc., 761 F